If he has a job, then his taxes helped pay for a lot of that.

Divorce, alimony, child support, taking various forms of welfare while taking cash, obtaining unfounded disability money, obtaining unfounded disability money for children, and several, mostly public jobs pay much more than $10 an hour for not working.

It’s because he has made several false assumptions. The biggest one is that keeping your own money through less taxation is subsidization.

This is capitalism though. The idea that our employers need to fund our retirements is a new notion, invented in the last 100 years, and it’s just not tenable when you stack it against the way the world has to work.

This is nearly all government over time. The question is how long the government can keep it up. Some last longer than others.

I think you don’t give them enough credit, or that you give the other side too much credit.

I disagree. If you look at gov’t as a whole, even when it is done well, it continues to grow, and continues to need more money.

*Posted under the wrong user.

I believe it. I just added a similar post of Toby Keith that has the same resonance.

Live in Oklahoma, so I naturally have 2 stories about Toby Keith.