I think you may be onto something. I used to religiously come to this site and have started to pop on here and there. I think Kon addressed things well, going by what was posted. So lets try to drag him for the very same thing he addressed in the damn article!! So edgy and provocative! Its really tiresome 

simple its the gawker network. They are cry baby’s and like to whine about everything. mis the better old days we used to have.

My hot take: current jezebel writers got soooooo excited that a current relevant show made an unattributed reference to a decade old jez article that they had to find a way to write about it. but they couldn’t help underlining the reason why this website used to be relevant and no longer is--mistaking real social…

“Jezebel’s corporate overlords command it to be more controversial and click-baity. Instead becomes less relevant.”

I don’t know what tone y’all are going for with stuff like this and the list of actors who can’t act. I like Jez and I defend it but this is bait.

Which makes me all the more nervous for him. People love to see the castle built, people get bored with the standing castle and they LOVE to see the castle fall.

He’s had a very hard life:

Oh my lard, clean shaven buzzed head Keanu is best.

It’s because he’s experiencing a bit of a career renaissance with the John Wick movies (specifically the third one coming out). And then his cameo in Always Be My Maybe was all-time funny. And he’s in the new Toy Story. He’s everywhere right now.

The dude donates money to charities among countless other good deeds. Would love to see an article like this on Rihanna or Beyonce

I’m with you here. The biting tone doesn’t really fit for this piece.

And it doesn’t sound like *he* expects special adulation for being mindful of others, so there’s something that comes off as mean-spirited in that suggestion.

Wow this was a completely unnecessary article. Not everything has to be hated on. He seems pleasant. People are excited by a pleasant person. Why the handwringing? 

One of my co-workers was walking down a San Francisco street when she tripped and nearly fell into a row of motorcycles. In that weird time slowing thing that happens in crisis moments, imagining the wave of tumbling bikes as she fell, an arm reached in and caught her while the other hand grabbed the first bike.

I know. Like he’s too good to grab my boobs and make a honk-honk noise? Like he’s sooooo much better than me?

The important question is whether he would respect me enough to touch me if I requested it.

He may be doing it to avoid appearances of impropriety, or to ensure others’ comfort. But underlying those theories is the assumption that he would put his hands on these people were it not for one of those decent reasons not to do so. Is it too crazy to think that maybe he just doesn’t want to put his hands on other…

Why be such a buzzkill? This is really thoughtful of him. It’s not bare-minimum considering he really didn’t have to do it. He was going above and beyond to make sure he didn't accidentally make someone uncomfortable.

Counterpoint: I do want to be touched by Keanu Reeves.