Uh-huh.

It’s just rather presumptuous to assume that what is “normal” is what mirrors your experience.

There are plenty “notmarl” working adults who have many, many times that amount in savings.

Why?

It's up to her. She could fire him in 2.2. seconds if she wanted.

Goodness, you are insufferable.

Why is Charlie Rose a jerk?

Lordy, COME ON.

Obviously the metrics on social media—-coupled with poor ratings—-for TNS were low enough to lead CC to end the show. Very strong social media presence has saved shows with poor ratings from the axe before (i.e., the sitcom Community). Obviously it couldn't here.

I certainly am. No one on Earth “deserves” an endorsement deal. You get them because companies want to pay you to promote their products.

So what?

Who cares, though? If that woman wanted media attention she would have done cartwheels or wore a costume. She wanted to do her personal best and that's exactly what she did. What's the issue?

Reese Witherspoon was the lead in “Wild” two or three years ago and was nominated for an Oscar for that performance if I'm remembering correctly.

Yes, there are a few different merits to quantify social media exposure/”buzz”

It's a very easy contract to write and to enforce, actually.

YES.

They violated someone’s privacy in order to get free publicity. They suck.

Again, for the 100th time: people are different and make different choices. Some choices get lauded. Some choices get vilified. PEOPLE ARE DIFFERENT AND THUS MAKE DIFFERENT CHOICES FOR THEIR LIVES AND CAREERS.

Again, you keep pointing out that two distinct individuals made different choices concerning their careers. Happens approximately 879 billions times a day. I’m not sure why you think it’s necessary to keep pointing out that 2 women who probably haven’t even met think differently and make different career choices.

Halle has an Oscar because she did an amazing job in Monster’s Ball not because she thinks exactly how other Black women think.