I read an article of what you can call a “broken cop”. It was a man who was formerly on the force, experienced his first shooting, and then his behavior got progressively worse by the month. Drug addictions, sleeping around with hookers (was married with kids), and all types of violent actions. However, the take away…

The “crunch” is only immutable if publishers insist on release dates that don’t take into account the realities of game development because they’re set not by experts in game development but by sales professionals. Then, if a game doesn’t sell (perhaps because of rushed development turning out a crappy game), they can…

Seriously. It just goes to show how ingrained “crunch time” has become that people in the industry think of it as a natural disaster or something. Boy oh boy, isn’t it surprising how we keep having to work around the clock at the end of projects? It’s totally not the result of poor time budgeting and management in…

Yes. Trademark is a protection to make sure people aren’t confused by the source of goods. To use a mark, you need permission. If you use a mark without a license, and then do something high profile and/or obnoxious, expect to have the license holder get pissed about it.

If you are making money from your use of their trademarks, then yeah they can do a lot of shit. Your example has nothing to do with what is happening in the article.

Yes, they can sue you if you put a Dominos trademark on a car, then film monetized Youtube videos with it.

As much as I sympathize with him, and as much as I dislike Domino’s, the truth is that they’re the ones in the right here.

Not really aimed at you so please don’t take personally, but people frequently misuse the journalistic “full disclosure” trope. You only state it where some potential conflict of interest might be at play. Example: if you were to say “Ford Co-Pilot360 will officially be the best new automotive technology since the…

I agree, but so long as the bar to obtain a driver’s license is so annoying low nationwide, it’s probably easier to build in these systems that support the driver.

I agree it’s annoying, but I imagine it’s like turning around a big ship.

Some quick research showed that the F-35 is much louder than the F-16.

Y’know what? Thanks for taking the time to break things down to the level you did; there’s a tendency in current social discourse to immediately take the most emotionally-reflexive and intellectually simple reaction to any situation, and I really appreciate that you slowed down and broke this situation into its…

A lot of these people will only dig in deeper as more of this comes out because despite the sophistication of what the Russians did, the average person does not and cannot admit to being wrong or fooled.

If you like puzzles I recommend playing Opus Magnum on the PC, its perfect for parents because you can leave the game at any time and what you were working on is saved automatically so you can pick right up where you left off. It also has a built in .gif maker so you can share and upload your solutions.

Stability Control is magic and does things the best drivers are physically incapable of. Nobody has forgotten how to drive. There are situations in which the best drivers physically cannot react fast enough or with the appropriate amount of precision.

Neutral: The only driver assistance I want in a car is ABS. I don’t need traction or stability control to assist me how to drive. It amazes how people forgotten about driving a car without traction control or the other million driver ads able. Cars would be so much cheaper without these unnecessary nannies.

As an upper-elementary teacher, I kind of like it when kids screw up once in a while on homework, though- it means that they’re going to learn what a 0 can do to a grade the hard way (a.k.a. the way the’ll remember it) before grades begin to “matter” in high school.

You seem to have not understood the article. You’re right that children don’t understand the far-off consequences of not getting a good job or having terrible nutrition. But the point of the article was that children need to be given safe opportunities to make decisions and then suffer the consequences of those…

You micromanage them as much as you have to

I don’t think what’s being suggested is being completely hands off and buddy-buddy. It reads to me to be more about how to not be constantly prompting your kids to do things by having them learn some consequences when they don’t do something they were supposed to do, but on the non-vital things. Maybe there won’t…