He’s probably happy that you dedicated 10+ pages to write about him.

Unfortunately, that’s Fox News. :(

Hahaha.

Not that much though. It’s kind of understood that some people are rich due to luck, be it lineage or other factors.

To remind people about their studio again of course. Everybody knows about Coke, but why does Coke still do advertisement? That’s how marketing works, to remind people of certain brands or products every now and then and to hold on to people’s attention.

That’s called marketing, and as far as I can tell, they have had pretty good success with it.

That’s probably why that website is changing hands ;) Heh.

In other words, the rich people own almost everything.

Firstly, I was referring to the general definition of what is appropriate and what is not. Secondly, there is no issue with backing a no interference policy, I am not compelled to agree with his actions.

I can live with people having different rights and wrongs as long as they do not interfere with the affairs of others.

Which is probably why philosophy does not always reflect the reality. I speak with pragmatism about what is currently happening. The explanation of the reality...is not equal to ideological opposition of rights.

Why must it be the government? The government is voted in by the people, and although not always the case, they reflect the wishes of the people to certain degrees. It might sound weird to someone who is used to the idea of free speech in its liberal form, but there exists countries where majority of the people are…

So what is the moral justification this time? To save humans from space aliens called Pokermans?

Rights can be artificially created, just like Americans’ “right” to bear arms. In most parts of the world, that is not a “right”. Arguing about something that can vary due to subjective definitions is always complicated.

But do they get shot on the streets in unreasonable manners such as those displayed in the recent events? They do not. Those are what the author pointed to. He even repeatedly mentioned that he was afraid of being shot, not only by the police, but also by other citizens of his own country. Do those things happen in…

Racism is not strictly an American problem, but racism in the form described by the author is an American problem.

I understand your intentions, and I think that it is understandable that you are feeling uneasy at the moment. However, if it is a violence and racial discriminatory issue, then let us discuss about it in an upfront manner. There is no need to bring in certain entities or products that most would agree is reasonably…

In the article, he very specifically mentioned his fears of being shot. In addition, I have never claimed that this is purely a firearms issue, I am sure that in my previous comment, I have mentioned that it is a race issue as well.

Which is the point all along - The issue lies in the American society, not the game. This is an issue because the author fears being shot for walking about places that he should rightfully be allowed to. Would the same thing happen in Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Germany, Sweden, etc? No. People might think that one is…

Rather specifically noted? So why Pokemon Go in the title? Let me tell you why, it’s sensationalism.