You're making my case all by yourself, thanks

I agree with everything you said, but if anyone of our players in this story had brought up the blood splatter problem, I don't see how Naz could have been even charged let alone facing a potential conviction.
I get that it would have fundamentally changed the story, and I always advocate that the writers should tell…

It's both useful and funny, just not to you and the snowflakes that overwhelmingly inhabit this site.

If you can't understand how I used it, maybe you should get it together.

The defense attorneys should have been all over that as a simple, fundamental argument of their case. I understand it's not up to either the police or prosecutor to bring it up, but it was still bad. That may have been the d'oh moment, but it wasn't explicit and she was also thinking about the fact that the new…

Still don't like how everyone ignored the blood splatter problem. They can tell what story they want to tell…but that was a huge plot hole.

Triggered much?

Completely disagree with you. If they're not saving it as a "gotcha" moment, it's a failure if it is not even brought up. The timeline is too short for him to be able to commit the murder, have the wherewithal(on heavy drugs) to clean himself(they scoured the house and would have checked the bathroom/shower)and/or his…

You bore me with your straw man(other crimes) and ad hominem(saying I imply alleged victims shouldn't be believed) arguments. I know you'll think you've won the argument because I refuse to waste another second of my time on you…so congratulations.

You believe accusations should be supported with evidence, and then you say that a woman's word is evidence. That's basically saying that the accusation itself is evidence…and that's just not true. No matter how many times you say it, it's just not true. That's not in any state or federal statutes of evidence, nor…

The SJWs are mobilizing. You must leave now…run out of that doggie door as fast as you can and find a no kill shelter. You have been warned. They're coming!

So he's a rape apologist because he believes that if someone is accused of rape there should be evidence to support that accusation?

If you consider being on pace to lose $70M and already scrapping plans for a sequel as "pretty well" then….ok

"Fucked buttholes". Hey, that does feel suprisingly good to type.

You got your Ghostbusters remake. How'd that work out?

Oh, so you're the arbiter of what should and should not be shown on a tv show? I guess I missed the memo where you either have a direct line and/or can read the minds of the show runners and writers. My mistake.
The fact that you resulted to name calling(by the way, am I dude, dork, or chief?) tells me all I need to…

A little late here, as I've just been binging on Netflix. So…what you're saying is that we know what the Vikings did, but we should only see what falls within your moral sensibilities?
First, you're certainly assuming a lot about the proverbial "we" and what "we" know about what the Vikings did or did not do. Not…

I just started watching this show today…never read the comics. Holding out hope I will enjoy it, not sure yet, pretty decent start….but DUDE! You're just a little bitch about this, aren't you? Why are you wasting your time on here bitching about this? There's so much else out there to watch/occupy your time with. We…

Sorry, it's moops. That's what the card says bubble boy!

Well, in a way, yes. It sucks that trying to get healthy backfired on him.