axial
Axial
axial

No, it isn’t remotely the same.

In principle I agree with you, but I want to point out that the C5 was a MAJOR change over the C4. The core concepts behind it are the same, and you can certainly spot similarities and analogues if you observe the unclad subframe assemblies, but the construction is so fundamentally different between the two cars that

The Nissan Z will likely be in the low to mid 40s for the things you actually want...just like its predecessor.

I hope close to nobody does if it’s a crossover.

I used to own an LT4-powered Corvette and currently own a ZR-1. The only reason anybody should want a Grand Sport over a ZR-1 is the fact that there are only 1000 of them and thus they are more likely to appreciate quickly if cared for, otherwise you can build one yourself for cheap using any “standard” LT4-equipped

The nameplate is kind of in a weird place, though, neither centered nor all the way to the side as you can see from the official teasers Lamborghini has shared.

Improved battery technologies are focused primarily on increasing the energy density over volume. With that in mind, you can just design a new battery pack with the same dimensions as the old one, but using the updated cells, and introduce them with the next model year. Heck, you could introduce them as an option,

Nuclear is the answer that meets our intermediate zero emissions goals without sacrificing the consumption required to drive the economies to sustain the change-over, but nobody wants to face that music.

The Daimler DB600-series, Rolls-Royce Merlin-series, or Pratt & Whitney R2800 all would have been absolutely worthy aero engines to make the cut.

1990-1995 LT5 didn’t make it? Start over, the list is broken!

I could build a real fuckin’ cool 911 and still have about 1.9 million dollars left over!

Go sit in a corner and think about how what you said affects others. You monster.

Some outlets have initial reviews out. It’s adorable how VW is covering up the interior when we all know it will be nigh identical to the ID.4.

This is a car that should have come to the US only in its proper R trim and nothing underneath that. It was intended as the flagship vehicle of the brand, so give it all the flagship trimmings. Hell, make it only in wagon.

The first three were so bad that I couldn’t stomach finishing the set.

Shit, at 0% the term is basically irrelevant. If 0% was available on the cars I’m considering I’d have traded in yesterday.

Rust-free, but usually riced to hell.

And here I am thinking that trading in my current car, which is worth more than I owe, and putting some additional cash down for a 30% down-payment on an 80k car with a 6-year 2% loan term is pretty stupid. These loans are downright terrifying.

That’s how I feel about it, too; the regen is basically variable engine braking. Also agreed about AT cars; even my DCT-equipped S3 does not engine brake like my old Corvette does.

They do, but in the manual cars they are used to enable/disable the auto rev-matching.