This really doesn't make sense or sound like it's practical at all. Different languages have different uses and practicalities.

She answered that question on the original article page, in the FAQ section at the bottom:

*throws up hands*

....

Same here. I bought a 64GB off contract brand new and have used it for almost 3 years now, and it still works great. The only reason I would upgrade is to either change carriers (using Sprint now and the phone won't work with T-Mobile which I would switch to), or the phone simply stops working.

Because awareness leads to prevention. What point of that do you not understand?

>____<

Again, the video highlights that fact that car systems are being retrofitted with cellular data systems, which CAN be breached remotely if there are exploits in the software. This will obviously be more common-place in vehicles as the technology grows (connecting everything to a network is where everything is headed).

Because the phones are physically designed to be held vertically?

"Maybe in the future this will be a concern...."

Are you implying that stealing a car, and being able to control every aspect of it are the same thing?

Most likely an algorithm.

$279 for the product, $74,721 for the installation fee.

Viagra was obviously the hardest to execute.

I guess you could say it flew right over his head.

...

Scan page for all images on the page, compare each image against Google's logo. If there's a match, flag it for review. Not that difficult to do ;)

It's not fool proof, hence why they demonstrate you can switch between the two (mirrored and camera modes).

Houston can be so boring without it. Hopefully that planned amusement park in New Caney comes into fruition.

It's a neat idea, however I don't see how it solves the core problem (taking your eyes off the road). I really think the evolution of controlling the cars features is through voice controlled dictation. Voice recognition isn't quite where it needs to be yet to be completely usable, but it's getting there.