Bah can't edit posts. I'll add that:
1) The Type R was the one that competed with Ferraris in terms of performance, not the others. That means that's the only one that should be compared when talking about prices,
2) It was more expensive than other NSXs, and
3) Best Motoring, the undisputed source of Japanese sports…

Well the original NSX wasn't cheap really. Take inflation into account and that the truly marvelous original NSX was only the Type R.

The troll-ish comment of the day: The green flag criticism by front page commentators made me realize how many people here don't have a clue about motorsports, with over 50 "likes" (stars) and many comments on that note.

Considering the context, yes they would. The biggest and most famous assholes in the world, coming to your country to laugh at you and to boast their victory. One of the ways to achieve that is the license plate, which is a direct insult.

For people mocking the situation, I think you should look at this in a first person perspective. Pretty much every single American would be raging if Top Gear went to your country to straight up mock Pearl Harbor, everything included, while making particular fun of that you lost there.

In today's criticism: good luck have fun insuring that car.

Considering I got over 50 stars ("likes") for my comments, I'd say you are the wrong one :P

Read the replies: I'm literally one out of hundreds of people criticizing the OP and his constant clickbaits.

If some youngster buys that car based on your recommendation, then you will. That car is a $15,000 ticking bomb, recommended by someone as irresponsible as the seller.

One more thing: the editors should be a bit more conscious about their buying suggestions in general, clickbaits like this one or not, because this site is frequented by many, many teenagers, that are very much inclined to impulse buying, even taking loans.

Let me see: Either buy a reliable and new daily driver, or a riced out, multiple irresponsible owners and most likely abused car, with very little info on the stuff that actually matters, like mileage. Uhm...

Which you can use in an Android device, like in Honda's. This announcement most probably means Waze is coming to cars, instead of relying only on awful and bound to obsolescence integrated car GPS', which is fantastic news.

Not saying he's not good. After all, I have fallen multiple times in his trap. More importantly, please don't ruin my (stolen) pun.

Still none is in Michael Ballabait's league (Ballaban).

Your thoughts on the (always overrated) Miata, please.

Nice accord coupe bro.

I read this as: "I've never had a problem with the GBA's screen, other that I can't see anything".

Ask anyone that knows about Game Boys and he'll tell you the one to get, the recommendation is the GBA SP 101, by a huge margin. Actually it's cheaper on the long run than a regular GBA, when you take batteries into…

Yes the SP has some minor flaws, but the screen is way, way, way superior than any other prior Game Boy.

I have tried the original GBA many times and own one actually, but happened to play with one just yesterday. You tend to forget how awful and practically unusable that screen is, just like with the original GB.

Because this list is not about bad generations altogether, but about bad versions/specs/trims/packages within a good generation.

I'll never know how half of yesterday's posters didn't understand it.

Lots of suggestions are off. The question is what is the worst version or spec of a great car, within the same generation. That means you cannot answer a different generation, like comparing a Camaro of the 80s with a Camaro of the 60s, and it also has to be a great car gen too. For example Golf MKIV and C3…