Andrew Rannells doesn't deserve sitcoms.

Sounds par Dunham.

Agreed on all counts. It's certainly possible, but is very reliant on the actor's intent, the director's handling, and the screenwriter's/screenplay's handling.

Likely, but cis-playing-trans carries different weight than white-playing-black or, really, any race-playing-other race.

I'm very torn, because yes to all this, but also there are dozens of public art installations that people would shed tears if there was any pseudo-interference, like if Trump built a man-made island with a giant Colossus of Rhodes of himself directly across from the Statue of Liberty.

A class act. Thanksgiving will never be the same.

Wikileaks will now be leaking all his unfinished manuscripts.

Lessons From The Screenplay keeps trying to break ground with an online analysis of screenwriting, but all it really does it point out symbolism and quotes Robert McKee a fuck-ton.

(Toilet flush)

Oh fuck off, FXX.

I'm jerking off into a plastic bag right now.

No one cares.

Ok, but Margo Martindale once played Chicago itself. That's how good she is.

I prefer it to New York, but, yeah, they're not exactly thrilled to have the moniker of "second city".

Literally eating the fuck outta it.

They're pushy because they really don't like New York.

He stores it in his mouth and then spits it onto the dog when it's presented.

There's a fair amount of stretching with various segments of this article, but as long as it stretches my pants, I don't care.

Hey, it's ageist to assume I can't have the same level of loathing and pity for my almost-31-year-old self as I did for my 18-year-old-self.

I think my key quibble with that is the use of "cultural touchstones." It appears to imply that you require people to have enjoyed certain things within a relative timeframe in order to relate to you, as opposed to sharing it with them in generous spirits and allowing them to understand you better (because you're…