avclub-ffc905126015cdc6758873970fb59828--disqus
Spencer Hastings
avclub-ffc905126015cdc6758873970fb59828--disqus

Not to mention thinking that Keith is a figment of Dory's imagination when he's clearly been shown interacting with other people from almost his first scene (e.g. getting soup in the restaurant).

Her voice on Masters of Sex is her doing an accent. Except, oddly, it's a "time period" accent, not a "geographical region" accent.

She does not have a sex scene. Also, look up the definition of "canoodle."

He was credited (as "Real Lot Polk") for all of his appearances.

The Emmys wouldn't let her compete as a Guest Star because AHS always submits as a miniseries, and there is no "Guest Star" category for miniseries.

You forgot "sexual harassers who aren't pedophiles" (OK if the whole world thinks they are)

Did she play Pennywise?

I took Maltin's class at USC and was impressed. He may be evenhanded, but that doesn't mean he doesn't know his stuff.

"Other provinces, like Ontario and Quebec (which have about two-thirds of the population of the country), have a provincial police force."

I don't see any cameras ….

Downvoted!

Sounds like you may be unclear on the concepts of a) being "in the credits" and b) "Michael Stuhlbarg."

Regardless of whether it could be rationalized post hoc, the fact that Gaines tried to kill her certainly made it SEEM to the audience like she couldn't be the mole. (That's assuming the audience makes the assumption that the bad guys all know who each other are, which is usually a safe bet in stories like this.)

The fact that Gaines genuinely tried to kill Nina went a long way toward making it seem like she couldn't be the mole.

There was also the hotel manager (Tom from Desperate Housewives) who helped them out, even though he knew he was dying, but then they wouldn't let him call his wife to say goodbye.

That scene never made sense to me. I get that it was supposed to show how far she was willing to go, but having sex with a strange man just to get access to a locker? That feels like it would raise more suspicions than killing him or even just grabbing him by the family jewels or something. I mean, she guns down

No country, especially not the US, would sacrifice their head of state in response to a terrorist threat.

That was the season when, IIRC, Jack tortured three innocent people — one of whom died as a result — and then went back and tortured one of them again. Turned out he was still innocent.

At least one of the creators had objectivist sympathies, which probably led to Chappelle often being portrayed in a negative light, but he was by no means "evil" or even really a villain. His death was a tragedy.

The real mysteries are the characters placed in peril whose fates are never definitively resolved (e.g. Lynne Kresge, President Keeler, Behrooz). (It was especially jarring that the guy who either murdered or seriously injured Lynne was treated like a good guy in subsequent seasons, with no repercussions.)