avclub-fcaae931422688b8a0134e51a7a2fb12--disqus
binkey
avclub-fcaae931422688b8a0134e51a7a2fb12--disqus

"…anyone would imagine that Mad Men was nothing but an unending dirge of misery and misogyny."

"…anyone would imagine that Mad Men was nothing but an unending dirge of misery and misogyny."

@avclub-52ed1f89cb6f846e8efba0e4eacf9c27:disqus  I'm not saying that you are in general a sexist person. I don't know you at all, so I can't judge you. But, you can praise Julia Ormond to the ends of the Earth and it won't change the fact that describing a woman as "Shrew Mctits" is a sexist comment.

It wasn't the firm who was being clueless regarding Hard Days Night. When the new guy (blanking on his name) whines that Don didn't complement them for the client's applause, Don points out that the ad was the client's idea anyway.

The article completely left out Moffat's story with Eccleston.

Yes, that was (the medical examiner from L&O).

He even got the Alec Guinness intonation right.

In a goofy robotic voice of course.

"Music is never finished." 
In other words

Broyles is not a shapeshifter, that is why it was necessary for Jones to bribe him with medicine for his son. So, no plot hole there.

Which Astrid Farnsworth?

When Walter came out of the bathroom and said something like "Did you hear anything?" at first I thought he meant, "Did you hear what I was doing in there."

Well my impression was that he is (was?) in a somewhat suicidal state. And since he's a good Christian, he couldn't very well go and kill himself. But if he happened to get killed by zombies while drinking himself into a stupor, he might still get into heaven.

I think wondering when people are going to wake up to the dangers of something that humans have been doing (in one form or another) since before recorded history might be a waste of time.

The document was definitely forged. When the prosecutors got their hands on it, they tested it to determine the age of the ink and knew it had just been signed.

I kind of disagree here. The basis of the legal system is one that presumes innocence and (in theory) gives anyone the right to put together the best defence they can. I would say it is in fact a law firm's ethical duty to defend even the most obviously guilty to the best of it's ability. That way, when that person is

Considering that Hitchens said of Jerry Falwell immediately after he died that if you gave him an enema you could bury him in a matchbox, I think Hitchens opened the door for this kind of response.

If it's angled away then it's further away (unless of course the Earth is in the part of it's elliptical orbit that is closer to the sun during winter, which I didn't actually consider).