The live format of this would be so much better if the scripts themselves were more than slightly funny.

On re-watch it seems a bit rushed, but even though it was predictable the bit of Paget Brewster crying at the end made me tear up.

Nope! But probably 13, maybe more.

I was feeling this episode until the friggin' Tucson gang put him in the pillory.

This episode had a real rough-draft feel to it, like they didn't have time to punch-up the jokes. It wasn't bad but it wasn't as good as the last two.

My favorite thing about this show is that it's made me laugh consistently.

Wait, are the episode names just the segment names put together? That's on me for not watching past the pilot, I guess.

THIS IS A MEDIOCRE SHOW

I have a question about the last season finale I forgot to ask at the time. When the Tucson gang is singing that one song to welcome Phil back into the group, is Todd making an uncomfortable face because he knows Phil 2 is about to tackle Phil or some other reason? Why would he know Phil 2 was about to tackle Phil if…

Aside from the somewhat awkward placement in the first episode I liked the title sequence a lot.

Where's the Dr. Ken review???

This was really funny. In the current network sitcom world, that's really good.

This show's premise is pretty much "Modern Family but instead of a mockumentary we just separate each sub-plot into its own act for no reason"

This was basically what it would've looked like if Modern Family had a really bad pilot.

That was one of the least funny Kickstarter videos for a comedy project I've ever seen.

Orange is the New Black

Also, it's worth pointing out that a small group of my friends (bless their hearts) as well as a small portion of the internet think this show is entirely staged. In that context, I admit it's less funny, but, it's real, guys. Come on. Right?

I always thought I had a lot of empathy but the fact that there are a lot of people who find this show hard to watch makes me reconsider. There are even people who "Review" makes uncomfortable and that's fake. Geez.

It said the NYT confronted him with evidence tho

I need the juicy deets, man. Who pointed out the holes in the story? Another comedian? Or was it the New York Times themselves?