Fair, fair. But they seem cool here, and it's totally possible WWE will carry that through. Maybe I just enjoy huge dudes wrecking shit in street clothes.

But Breeze was never the longtime champ/face of the division in the way Bayley was, right? Also, Breeze has a pretty specific gimmick that I can understand being harder to get over, whereas Bayley is both ultra kid-friendly and ultra smark-friendly.

Yeah, I think that's just a really popular, long-running, but baseless accusation. But whatever, let's be irresponsible!

Also, I dare anyone to not love Bayley. She made beating Tommy Dreamer half to death look adorable. Now, so did Mick Foley, but then who doesn't love Mick Foley?

Henry Ford and Walt Disney?

I look forward to Royal Rumble 2018, in which Sami enters at the #2 spot, does a credible job as the iron man before KO uses some typically KO shenanigans to toss him after entering around #20, after which KO just dominates … until the buzzer sounds for #30 and then, out of nowhere: https://www.youtube.com/wat…

I still suspect they're not going to pull the trigger on a Roman heel turn fully enough for this work, but I could see the Usos gaining something interesting if they were allowed to cut some promos after Roman turns, maybe even setting up some matches where they try and valiantly fail to win back their family's honor…

Could we just take some of the spare midcarders and start pairing them off as tag teams? Not going crazy with that, but maybe, like, two new teams? I feel like Dolph could just use any fresh start at this point.

The Dudleys are the classic example of an older team that's only going to be as good as its competition. The Usos aren't getting anything interesting out of them, nor are the Lucha Dragons, I suspect. But my goodness, Enzo and Cass, I could listen to Bubba Ray yell at them in the ring forever.

Shame about the Wyatts and Usos, but at least the Dudleys seemed completely rejuvenated by Enzo and Cass. I could have watched a whole lot more of that match.

It's a bold move, I'll give it that.

No plans. But a man likes to have some idea of his grand exits.

I don't doubt it. But it's also two Canadians who hate each other and hockey-fight the moment they set eyes on each other. That's really all I need to know.

Are all Raw audiences smarky? I know some definitely are, but I thought at least some are more on the mark side, and the bows for Roman feel pretty uniform. Either way, if this is all leading into (a) a terrific match between AJ and Roman that can get revisited for a longer program later and (b) a fun starter feud…

Cesaro wrecking shit for a few months with an IC Open Challenge would be the most fun thing ever. LET HIM BE IC TITLE CENA.

Tonight's Top Pick is … the IMDB "Whose Birthday Is It?" page!

All very true. That said, I'm all in on Nakamura retiring Taker at WM 34 (give the man his Cena match at 33), so I'm just as insane (or brilliant!) as everyone else.

I *may* save Jeopardy for my departure WOT though.

I'm reading enough of the wrestling interwebs for them to not be totally new to me, and I bought and watched most of the CM Punk blu-ray, so I've got some sense of the glory that was the Straight-Edge Society. I will say those dudes are absolutely MASSIVE and look mean and cool as fuck, in a way that honestly does…

Hey man, if you're going to be as late on making the obvious joke as I am at posting the Tuesday WOT, somebody's gotta swoop in and pick up the slack.