And yet you seem to watch and comment as much as any fan.

I suppose the point was to make Julia and Derek look like a geniuses with artistic integrity, without actually showing them create a great musical.

I just don't agree with the idea that "I haven't showered" or "don't cum on my dress" were the same as "no". She obviously wasn't into it and he should have sensed that. But saying you haven't showered could easily be misinterpreted, whereas an outright refusal cannot.

I am trying to avoid "victim-blaming" here, but Natalia wanted to have sex. Just not the sex Adam is into. The fact that he was drunk does not excuse his behaviour, but she could have been clearer. She should have said no. And I do not believe that she was too scared to tell him that…

What were the two incidents in which she objected?

They are obviously drifting apart, as friends often do. Charlie sold out by becoming successful, while Ray continues to stagnate.

I love RENT. And comparing it to Sh*t List is insulting.

Still convulsing in agony every time they mention Rent. Stahp it, Smash. Just stahp.

Nothing sucks more than people who obsessively attack this show.

Nobody else is doing that. Welcome to 2013.

Comeau and Matthew Patel in the same episode. They should just cast Scott Pilgrim alumni whenever CeCe needs a new ex-boyfriend…

I love Jessa and all her wannabe hippie bullshit, so this episode worked for me. As far as character studies go, there was nothing revelatory offered, but whatever. It's about the journey, man…

A supernaturally handsome man shoehorned into the production of fledgling Broadway shows so as to inspire their composers with unresolved sexual tension?

Yeah…especially 30-something coffee shop managers and 20-something carpenters bankrolled by their grandmothers.

But you're still here.

Man, you just live for shit like this, huh? Watching something you hate so you can rant and rave about it immediately after. Get over yourself.

Haters keep on hatin'. I feel you, Todd. But it's early days yet. Let's wait and see.

How DARE you >=/ Rachel Berry is nowhere near the levels of mediocrity that Karen Cartwright has descended to. Unlike the writers on Smash, RIB allow her to be unlikable, instead of depicting her as some perfect victim. And unlike Karen, Rachel actually has the star power to back up her attitude.

I just about had an apoplectic fit when they invoked the name of Jonathan Larson >=/ Like…bitch, don't even…
Smash continues its tiresome trend of telling, rather than showing us how great these assholes are. Meanwhile, the characters that don't get drooled over (Sam, Ivy, Tom) get on with the business of actually…

Haters keep on hatin'. Old Rachel was the bomb diggity. New Rachel is okay…