Umm… lemme check.

Guys guys guys! I live five minutes from Wahlburgers. Please direct all questions/bee-jays this way.

God, the commenters are getting young around here.

Just repeat the following to yourself: all movies about "the future" or "the past" tell us more about the time in which they were made than about the actual future or past.

Zing?

It's a little… plotty, no?

The ending is legit, but it was still just intended as a joke, not a set-up for a series.The filmmakers have said so plenty of times.

Oh sure, that was great. TOTALLY badass. Not at all pandering and stupid.
(I'm sorry for my cynical negativity. It's aimed at GB 2, not you).

Counterpoint: I watched GB two weeks ago, and I laughed like a buffoon. So did my wife, who knew nothing about it.

See, I was a budding thirteen-year-old cynic when GB 2 came out, and the Scoleri Bros looked like ridiculous muppets to me. I put them in the minus column.

What an asshole!

I guess you're right, Larry King and Casey Casem occupy the exact same space in our culture and our collective memories as Bobby Brown.

Ghostbusters 2 isn't terrible, but it does provide perhaps the single best example of what's wrong with most sequels (at least back then; these days all sequels are made in a lab or pre-ordained or based on some YA book or some other horse shit). The comedy is broader; there are plenty of callbacks to beloved moments…

I think Longshot has three fingers. Or three and a thumb. So, four.

Haven't seen many movies, hmm?

Haven't seen many movies, hmm?

And now your wish has come true!

Four years later: still hot.

Every time, I'd be gripped with terrible anxiety for the last half of the movie, thinking "but is that sick triceratops going to be OK?!"

And to be honest it might have been fifteen times.