avclub-ec1c465aa52c3e962778e3c29b5fdb4d--disqus
Punchdrunk
avclub-ec1c465aa52c3e962778e3c29b5fdb4d--disqus

Hey, fuck you!

Hey, fuck you!

IMHO, they don't have a writer who's a 'fan'. I've noticed that when I feel like I saw a different movie than the reviewer around here, it's usually a horror film.

IMHO, they don't have a writer who's a 'fan'. I've noticed that when I feel like I saw a different movie than the reviewer around here, it's usually a horror film.

Yeah, that ain't art.

Yeah, that ain't art.

Sometimes, things are just inexplicably awful. That's usually when a piece of work actively pisses me off.

Sometimes, things are just inexplicably awful. That's usually when a piece of work actively pisses me off.

I guess I just like liking things.

Gathly, if a man was on a date, and they had a conversation about foreskins in which his date expressed their disgust at uncircumcised penises, he might write that person off as a potential partner, especially if he happened to be an uncircumcised gentleman.

I don't see fans, I only see people.

It's really really beige, but there are some good performances, and it's not as bad as, say, Still Standing or According to Jim. Faint praise.

I'm having trouble thinking of any, and I watched in syndication. It's not a memorable show, to me, it was just kind of there, and better than anything else on the dial in the time slot. (the middle of the night)

Almost every episode is self-contained, pick three or four sequential eps and see what you think.

I don't think the film intends it to be anything but rape. And I do think that Farris' line is intended to give the audience permission to laugh.

Not a near masterpiece. Funny and weird and disturbing while drawing inside the lines. Interesting. Subverting the formula.

Are they those weird, brown-tinted ones that look like they were made in the 70's?

And confirmation bias.

Well, someone's really fucking stupid.

Just curious, how would you make that final tableau more gruesome?