Oliver!. Closely followed by Chicago. My Fair Lady loses major points for recasting Julie Andrews. West Side Story is very good too, but Oliver! and Chicago are the only musical films that are better than the stageshows they're based on.

Oliver!. Closely followed by Chicago. My Fair Lady loses major points for recasting Julie Andrews. West Side Story is very good too, but Oliver! and Chicago are the only musical films that are better than the stageshows they're based on.

@avclub-cf50b28ef624912ff106c57ca9be41dc:disqus But is it any good?

@avclub-cf50b28ef624912ff106c57ca9be41dc:disqus But is it any good?

It's a Parks and Rec reference, so it's not quite as mean as it sounds.

It's a Parks and Rec reference, so it's not quite as mean as it sounds.

The ABC Murders was the first thing I thought of too. But at least that was clever (and fun, too. Letters are fun!)

The ABC Murders was the first thing I thought of too. But at least that was clever (and fun, too. Letters are fun!)

Not enough. Shoot the gun too. And LaGuerta's hand. Shoot anything which might look suspicious!

Not enough. Shoot the gun too. And LaGuerta's hand. Shoot anything which might look suspicious!

"You are under arrest. You have the right to remain silent, you-"
"Kill him. Stab him through the chest and dispose of the body."
"Dad, not now, I'm working."

"You are under arrest. You have the right to remain silent, you-"
"Kill him. Stab him through the chest and dispose of the body."
"Dad, not now, I'm working."

But what if a wizard did do it?

But what if a wizard did do it?

But they actually had no evidence that he was dead. Even the blood-stained shirt (which should have been stupidly obvious was 30 years old) wouldn't be evidence of murder, since apparently the bloodstain on it was from a nosebleed. The most they could do is question him about the guy's disappearance, and even then…

But they actually had no evidence that he was dead. Even the blood-stained shirt (which should have been stupidly obvious was 30 years old) wouldn't be evidence of murder, since apparently the bloodstain on it was from a nosebleed. The most they could do is question him about the guy's disappearance, and even then…

They needed a reason for Deb to shoot LaGuerta, so for the final scene they made her a sadistic moron. Any rational person wouldn't ask you to shoot your brother. There were just idiotballs flying all over the place in this episode.

They needed a reason for Deb to shoot LaGuerta, so for the final scene they made her a sadistic moron. Any rational person wouldn't ask you to shoot your brother. There were just idiotballs flying all over the place in this episode.

@avclub-33235e3d066bad95b6eea457826f7507:disqus  Absolutely. Their reasons for removing it appear to be cowardly and moronic. That said, given how much Family Guy aims to offend these days (it's possible they're trying to shock the audience into laughing, but since they're not actually saying anything original then…

@avclub-33235e3d066bad95b6eea457826f7507:disqus  Absolutely. Their reasons for removing it appear to be cowardly and moronic. That said, given how much Family Guy aims to offend these days (it's possible they're trying to shock the audience into laughing, but since they're not actually saying anything original then…