Speaking as one of the millions of people who voted to Remain, go fuck yourself, you high-horsing, sanctimonious shit.

You do realise that most trade deals specifically exempt financial activities, so whatever piss-water alternative is finally given to Britain by an embittered EU is bound to be bad for the City and the service sector?

I think it's one-part people protesting against the government of the day, austerity and the perceived 'overlordship' of Brussels without expecting an actual Leave outcome, and one-part people who genuinely wanted Leave but are now waking up to the realities of that.

It's almost like it was a bad idea to hold a referendum during the Glastonbury weekend and the Euros.

Look, Northern Ireland has made great strides since the Troubles, but this is still a region that is sporadically seized by violence - both nationalist and unionist - by mere technical discussions of when the British flag should or should not be raised on public buildings.

You do realise that the WTO is just a general framework for facilitating the reduction of trade barriers that has no specific relation to the EU or the EEA?

I'm sure the working classes will benefit from the subsequent total gutting of labour relations legislation by an arch-conservative Tory government.

So the UK left the EU to escape austerity?

It's this kind of bafflingly inaccurate assessment of what Brexit actually means that makes it far easier to understand how we ended up in this horrible situation.

The UK won't get a Norwegian solution, because Norway still has to pay into the EU pot, accept EU regulations and the freedom of movement - all of which were at the centrepiece of the Leave campaign.

It's not coincidental. The SNP basically sat out the referendum campaign in the hope that the UK would slip out of the EU, providing the pretext for a second referendum on Scottish independence.

O, heavens forfend! Because of course, if there's anything gay people enjoy, it's being thrust into a relationship with someone they find innately unattractive just to maintain a lie about themselves. But clearly it's the beards that are the real victim here…

You literally said it in the very post I'm replying to.

To demonstrate how completely screwed up your logic is. Apparently, just because people have been able to survive inequality means that they should just shut up and let it be, rather than try to change it,

Carlos Danger?

It sounds to me like you just have incredibly serious issues about sexuality in general, which I would advise you - and I'm not even being funny here - to seek counselling for. Because its fine not to be sexually aroused by nudity and genitalia; it's quite another to seemingly shun most media (while still offering…

>not homophobic
>would "prefer to not have to see" two men hugging

"As a genuine gay person, when you were socially straight - were you really so traumatized at fitting in and having sex with women?"

Wait, are you referring to Wikus van de Merwe?

I love that they've gone on to no less than three separate reviews and accused each one of them of being out of step with critical opinion. Aren't they beginning to see a pattern?