Disney's theatrical release record for sequels is far from stellar, though, hence my reply to Skull Kid.

Does limiting our examination to theatrically released films really improve Disney's reputation much?

Does limiting our examination to theatrically released films really improve Disney's reputation much?

But Disney also has a terrible record with sequels. Toy Story is I think the most notable success in the actual sequel department. Iron Man 2? Not so good. Cinderella/Beauty And The Beast/Mulan/Peter Pan/etc. 2? Atrocious.

But Disney also has a terrible record with sequels. Toy Story is I think the most notable success in the actual sequel department. Iron Man 2? Not so good. Cinderella/Beauty And The Beast/Mulan/Peter Pan/etc. 2? Atrocious.

"Richard Baxton piloted his Recon Rover into a fungal vortex and held off four waves of mind worms, saving an entire colony.

"Richard Baxton piloted his Recon Rover into a fungal vortex and held off four waves of mind worms, saving an entire colony.

I expect one decent film which everyone will think is good thanks to THE PHANTOM MENACE, followed by at least three horrible, horrible sequels.

I expect one decent film which everyone will think is good thanks to THE PHANTOM MENACE, followed by at least three horrible, horrible sequels.

Last I heard, the plan was not actually to sail into the hurricane, but rather around it. They just didn't make it.

Last I heard, the plan was not actually to sail into the hurricane, but rather around it. They just didn't make it.

They've said that "The Thick of It", if it returns, will only take the form of specials from now on.

They've said that "The Thick of It", if it returns, will only take the form of specials from now on.

Wait, "house full of monsters" doesn't suggest plot directions anymore?

Wait, "house full of monsters" doesn't suggest plot directions anymore?

It's really a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" scenario for divine-level beings, I think. Being willing to use your full power makes you seem like a monster who doesn't recognize the moral status of other beings. Being unwilling to use your full power makes you seem like a monster for not valuing other beings…

It's really a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" scenario for divine-level beings, I think. Being willing to use your full power makes you seem like a monster who doesn't recognize the moral status of other beings. Being unwilling to use your full power makes you seem like a monster for not valuing other beings…

Very true, but I don't know how satisfying an explanation that is for many. Would be an interesting survey.

Very true, but I don't know how satisfying an explanation that is for many. Would be an interesting survey.

It's interesting how the review considers the idea of an god-like being which acts upon the imperative to eliminate/reform evil as a bad thing, considering how the apparent inaction of God in the face of immorality is often raised as an objection to his moral character/existence.