avclub-d83db5f35f6ff3433edc33b58e6af6e0--disqus
Chalupacabra
avclub-d83db5f35f6ff3433edc33b58e6af6e0--disqus

Yeah, but if people stopped engaging in pointless, uninformed speculation on the internet then there really would be little left besides porn and cat gifs.

Everyone knows Natasha Leggero owns the copyright for anything relating to toilet babies.

….that honestly goes a long way in explaining why I love it (and their similar sounding songs) so much.

Holy shit, the guitar on Oblivius is so insanely good.

Now That's What I Call A New Strokes EP

Mostly this reminds me of how Josh Ritter always works various covers into the middle of "Harrisburg" when he plays it live.

Or Paul's Boutique. Or Odelay.

These types of things happen sometimes with licensing; it sounds like a pretty convoluted process. There's the old chestnut about how Coolio didn't know Weird Al had paid a substantial fee to parody Gangster's Paradise and made a pretty big fuss about it initially.

No and you're surely the first person to ask this question.

Now you're just being anil.

By ending that sentence with "children," you guaranteed I heard it in the voice of Isaac Hayes.

"Gather round, gang. This week I want you to BRING ME PICTURES OF SPIDER-MAN."

If young me knew that a Doom/Ape Escape hybrid existed, I can only begin to imagine the absurd level of excitement.

Will the robots accept elderly people's medication in lieu of other forms of currency?

Anyone who hasn't heard it needs to check out the WTF with Leggero. She tells the story of dating/living with a pretentious con man that is especially fascinating given her onstage persona.

"Guys, I've got a great idea, just stay with me here - if we force a love triangle then we can create an excuse for characters to constantly act in ways that make absolutely no sense."

Weren't the Beastie Boys also called The Young and the Useless at some point?

Yeah, the edgiest episode of Home Movies is the one they made to mock the network for pressuring them to be more "edgy" and "adult." I feel like aside from the occasional reference to sex or alcohol it was pretty PG.

This whole article is a weird mess. This is also "news" that's been common knowledge to anyone with passing interest in the show for years now. I'm not sure if it's sponsored content or just really poorly researched.

People are already reviewing the reunion tour of acclaimed punk band Bear vs. Shark?