It makes sense in terms of expressing why your opinion is wrong-headed, but I don't think that's what you are asking.

Think about it like this: The candidates are going to have work extra hard in order to say crazy stuff in a limited amount of time in order to stand out, because right now, nobody is standing out.

I'm sure they'll call him whatever Elizabeth Berekley's character name was in "Showgirls".

I'm going to make an assumption and then a conclusion:
Assumption: The police can't charge somebody with assault in that state without the victim pressing charges.
Conclusion: That guy did not want to have to publicly discuss the fact that he got beat up by Screech in a bar on Christmas Day.

"treating them like characters out of a Springsteen song, or at least a catchy Killers knockoff of a Springsteen song."

From the trailer, I was under the impression that this movie was basically just "The Hurt Locker", but with a military dog instead of Jeremy Renner.

If you can't get into the movie because it is pro-Kiss, that makes sense, sure, but to say that you genuinely can't believe that SWS would like Kiss because of his age makes no sense at all.

It's actually both, the character in the books was a doll, and then they made dolls.

It is really weird that they built an entire day around a show that they didn't even want to keep making until somebody else put up most of the money.

Have you ever met anybody named Robert who preferred "Robert"?

Just once, I wish he had said "Yeah, I *am* comparing myself to [my better]. Damn right!" Humbleness can only get you so far.

I would think that the most controversial scene would have to be from "Temple of Doom", given how many people accuse it of out-and-out racism for pretty much the second half of the movie.

Everybody always focuses on the shower part as being Grade-A Spielberg manipulation, at the cost of accuracy. (And, admittedly, it is that.) I do kind of understand the accusation that the movie is more about Schindler triumphing over the Holocaust, that it's more about 6000 people who lived, as opposed to actually…

I kind of assume he is using "travesty" in the classic sense of the word , not the more-modern "travesty of a sham of a mockery of two shams of a travesty" sense. [If only because that is what a pretentious person would do, use a deliberately inflammatory word and then say "No, I meant it in the more obscure way,…

Armond White is considered a troll movie critic because his opinions are terrible and inaccurate, not his facts.

Remember when AMC used to show classic western movies instead of trying to make modern westerns that nobody wants to watch?

I feel the opposite (sort of). With The Rock, this feels like a waste of his talent and charisma. There is nobody on "Entourage" who gave the impression that their time could be better spent by doing anything else.

Apparently, when Disney bought Marvel, they specifically said, "You don't need to worry about marketing to girls, we've got girls pretty well sewed up, we bought you to appeal to boys."

Once you explicitly decide "This is not a human being, not like I am," treating them as less than human is just following the belief through to the natural logical conclusion.

There are two scenes in "Return of the Sith" that are basically all CGI which, as far as I understand, were way more directed by Spielberg than Lucas. Flipside, I believe that Lucas, in addition to supervising the editing on it, shot "second-unit" stuff on Jurassic Park [in that case, I think they were more pick-up…