The folks responsible for this feature clearly do not know or understand their audience. Note that if you follow the link to "Ant habitat kit with sand" you'll find the following warning: "CHOKING HAZARD — Small parts. Not for children under 3 yrs."
The folks responsible for this feature clearly do not know or understand their audience. Note that if you follow the link to "Ant habitat kit with sand" you'll find the following warning: "CHOKING HAZARD — Small parts. Not for children under 3 yrs."
Yeah, 2015 is soooooo old, man.
I gave the embedded song a fair shake. I truly did. Not only is it quite terrible, the comparison to Small Faces (let alone The Cars, Badfinger, or Big Star) is one of the most nonsensical things I've ever heard.
Could there be a better illustration of what's wrong with online content than the AVClub once again (as they do every week) promoting a TV show review as "news"?
I don't know if he was the best captain but Sulu has the best Facebook posts.
Besides, it doesn't make a lick of sense.
Obviously he's not Ego. . .
He's Ego-Prime!
http://peerlesspower.blogsp…
Stick around after the end credits . . .
I do not hate cilantro any more than I hate road tar, carbon paper, blister packs, or shoelaces. What those all have in common with cilantro is that NONE OF THEM BELONG IN FOOD.
The only plus to writing memoirs so young is how much more likely it is you might actually remember correctly the things you're writing about. I enjoy autobiographies but often remind myself just how piss-poor most humans are at accurately remembering things (further exacerbated by the very human quality of refusing…
While I agree that Christmas is the best of the lot, it's still only about 2/3 of a good movie. It's fantastic when it sticks to the extended family stuff, but some of the broader scenes are pretty hard to take. I remember showing this to a girlfriend who'd never seen it and I had basically forgotten the whole opening…
True fact: that is the greatest scene ever filmed to do whippets to.
Willy Wonka will reveal to you the mysteries of the universe.
You'll forget them by the time you come down, of course, which is why you need to do a whole case.
Elvis never lost his voice — and an argument can be made that as it deepened over the years, it became more powerful, but only when he actually engaged with his material, which became less and less frequent over the years as the Vegas rot seeped in. But damn, some of his absolute finest vocals are from very late in…
I watched this once. But owing to my policy of not watching movies starring Charlton Heston that are not Touch Of Evil, I will never watch it again. Because the only thing worse than a Charlton Heston performance is Richard Harris also being in the picture. Seriously, I cannot fathom how either of those two hacky hams…
And here I just always assumed it was because the two previous Hulk movies were miserable flops.
Indeed, but only the one I linked to has lots of overt Prisoner references.
Ever seen the Columbo episode where McGoohan plays a spy?
http://www.imdb.com/title/t…
Actually, now that I think about it, it should be "hoist WITH their own petard."
Yeah, I know, but it's not like anyone uses "petard" these days either, except in the context of this phrase, so I don't think it's asking too much to get the idiom correct if you're going to use it. As I said, just a pet peeve.
HOIST on their own petard, not hoisted.
Sorry, but this is a huge pet peeve and writers should know better.
D'oh! That's what I meant to say, as it is correct. So everyone just ignore my comment and skip right to Roc Kit's, please.