Can they not be both kind of black metal and kind of post-metal, given how there's so many sub-genres of metal that bands can easily fit into several at once?

@avclub-cfe912f5cb3aa572bd1c9ae2a9b82207:disqus Because they didn't come out with another sequel until 2010.  And because the Toy Story sequels were much much better than Cars 2 or Monsters U.

The bird was actually legitimately pretty funny, and even the talking dog wasn't bad.  Up is amazing.

Finding Nemo is great.  Probably middle of the pack for Pixar, but still great.

Yeah, I'm not sure why GY!BE is listed under "where not to start".  They're less accessible than Sigur Ros and EitS, sure, but they're just as important to the genre, aren't they?

I'm not entirely sure how post-metal they are, but Agalloch is pretty good.  The Mantle is probably a decent place to start with them.

@avclub-6905afb1e1dcec1ab05eeb9d7581fc24:disqus I've never been able to get into Sunn O))); they just seem like 17 minute slogs of random droning.  Is there a good, reasonably accessible place to start with those guys?

I'd suggest that @avclub-920530cb8744c679e3a2ece84f1d5ce4:disqus start with Oceanic, as it's more accessible than Panopticon, and probably just as good.

A Pup Named Scooby-Doo was, I suppose, not quite as terrible as it should have been, but it was still not good.  The original series was probably my favorite, but 13 Ghosts of Scooby-Doo was also pretty good.  I haven't seen any of the new ones.

@avclub-bca3531762af8a993c4f60c48fd5e33b:disqus Wikipedia says it was made in 1961, so early sixties, and it was apparently one of Disney's last black-and-white films, so makes sense that one would think it was from the 40s.

Edit: I was replying to the wrong comment, sorry about that.

@avclub-e129a878f7b0e5aa9ac09e0282f64ea6:disqus The 60s had 101 Dalmatians, The Jungle Book (which is admittedly crazy racist at times), and The Sword in the Stone (which is probably less noteworthy than the last two, but probably my favorite Disney film from that decade).  And I hated it, but Mary Poppins as well.…

@avclub-920530cb8744c679e3a2ece84f1d5ce4:disqus For some reason, the early high school me decided to sit down and watch the remake of Herbie starring Lindsay Lohan when my little brothers were going to watch it a few years back.  It effectively eliminated any desire I might have possibly had to watch a live action…

Yeah, I'm probably just remembering the celebrities/fictional characters that I actually recognized.

I just realized that I can't off the top of my head name a single Disney film from the 70s.  (Glances over to shelf of VHS tapes) The Rescuers was fairly solid, wasn't it?  And checking the Wikipedia list of Disney films, the original Pooh movie is pretty great when you're three or four, and Robin Hood is probably a…

I was in the fourth grade when I saw it, but I seem to recall my dad (who took me and my brothers to see it) realizing Scrappy was the secret villain way before the reveal with the not so subtle tip-off of him scratching his head with his hand like he was a dog.  So I'm not sure if something so telegraphed was that…

That thing with the hillbilly snails that you never learnt the name of actually sounds pretty hilariously awful.

At least you missed out on the "let's make a cartoon about these cartoon characters when they were babies/little kids" era of children's programming.  Because the 90s (late 80s?) had a shitton of that.

"But I wondered why they made a movie out of it."  Soulless cash grab?
I remember finding this scene being possibly the only amusing part of the movie even as a fourth grader http://www.youtube.com/watc… , but now even it seems pretty stupid, and completely tonally dissonant with with the concept of Scooby Doo.They…

I dunno, I thought it was more of an 8.5278254393 +/- 0.000001538/e