avclub-b9d88fa1cbe8a5974b469eccd7b19aba--disqus
seaants
avclub-b9d88fa1cbe8a5974b469eccd7b19aba--disqus

I once answered the door in my underwear only to find an innocent, wide-eyed Unicef boy on the other side of the door. On an unrrelated note: I've never killed anyone.

I don't believe that they were trying to convince you that the cops killed her.

I bet Andrew Jarecki is just DYING to have something happen on the Durst front right about now.

The article did no such thing, so it's unfortunate that it seems to have convinced people otherwise.

I appreciate this joke even though I liked "It Follows."

Just to be clear - in your mind, guilty of murder or not, he should be convicted of said murder regardless of the facts of the case, solely on the basis of having committed a previous act of cruelty? Just making sure.

Lock him up and throw away the key! And we just KNOW that the fine servicemen of Manitowoc know a thing or two about throwing keys places!

The guy answered the door in a towel. I don't know about you, but where I'm from, that's reason enough to spend the rest of your life in jail.

— The bullet with Halbach’s DNA on it came from Avery’s gun, which always hung above his bed.

Petition to remove this shitty article from this site. All of this comes from Kratz himself, who, as we know, is not credible, and is now attempting to save face. Even if true, none of this is damning. The most damning evidence against Avery was presented, in detail, in the documentary.

It seems plausible that someone else (other than police) could have planted the burnt remains in his burn pit, if they were indeed burned at one of the other burn pits on the property. People want to simplify this case and say, either he was framed by the cops, or he was guilty. I get the sense that the case is far

Those are all very reasonable points. I'm just not personally making the assumption that she was forced to go - she may have been, but we don't actually know that, that's an inference. Whether or not she was forced is not relevant in terms of the overall case, but it's relevant in terms of whether or not Auto Trader

The local authorities did not actually recuse themselves. They were on the scene and the ones to discover the key in the bedroom.

I'm comforted in knowing Kratz was probably miserable over the holidays.

There was reasonable doubt out the wazoo. Every single piece of evidence is questionable.

I'm really not seeing Auto Trader as the villains of this case. We don't actually have any direct evidence that Teresa expressed discomfort about returning to the Avery lot and that she was forced to go.

He also keeps harping on about the fact that Holbach allegedly saw Avery in a towel, and . . . that means he later orchestrated luring her to the property to have his nephew help rape and kill her how, exactly? So he answered the door once in a towel. Even if he did do that on purpose, on a previous occasion, that

Even the suggestion that the blood seeped into a crack was proven false when they opened up the floor and no blood was found.

Can you talk some more about this "crime scene clean up business" that you own? That sounds interesting.

They also seemed the likely candidates to have deleted her voicemails. However, I'm also suspicious of the two men who happened to go hunting at the time of Theresa's disappearance and were each other's only alibi.