What are you talking about? If you look at what I have written I have nothing but honest praise and affection for the thoughts you have shared. What trap?

Of course, @avclub-912e79cd13c64069d91da65d62fbb78c:disqus, words only have their literal denotative meaning which is why you are not only accurate and insightful in your comment as I show, but also why I can say sincerely that you are correct. This is unassailable logic.

Hmm this is a searing hot take with the word fascist thrown in, to boot. Good word choice with the terms "millennial" and "bullshit." Also, a very nice dismissive "something" and "who knows" at the end to compliment and accentuate the contempt for the "bunch" which indicates not only detachment but also disdain. This…

Oh, I don't know…

If you read stories for the plot you are quite literally missing the forest for the trees.

That is true. I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you for your insightful contributions to this thread. Your well reasoned comments display a high level of insight that is not only persuasive but also unique. Truly I understand why an iconoclast like you might have, how do you say, "haters."

There are over one hundred comments on this review. Mine is the best, according to the voting community. Probably because it contains a detailed analysis of the actual work that includes examples. I invite you to re-evaluate.

You speak as if questions are a bad thing. This show has an amazing sense of continuity, and each thread isn't going to be disposed of in a single 11 min timeframe. Instead of thinking of each episode as a self-contained unit, think of it as a chapter in a book. A series is just that: a series of stories that resolve…

9 out of 10 comments on this review so far are along the lines of, "it was frenetic and fast paced" or complain of some kind of incoherency. This episode does set up a lot of things for down the line, true, but there's still a lot of text to unpack in the story proper that a reductive critique of the structure totally…

Shocking, right? That'd we be discussing it and sharing our hot takes on a pop culture website is irresponsible.

Oh I dunno, maybe it has something to do with the backing of a major studio, infinite number of radio plays, a position at the top of the charts, a high-profile performance on television, an outspoken artist who attracts other types of controversy both in the courts of law and in his personal dealings and general…

Had to pop in and see if people were being self-righteous. Ah, yes very good show. Mmm. Pat those backs.

That's a bit 90s don't you think? I expect something better from you, with your unique view. How about unaccompanied children trying to cross the border in greater numbers than ever before? That's in the news. You read the news right?

That's a hot take. Tell me what we should be upset about.

I dunno, is every post you make going to contribute nothing and only stand as a testament to your ability to complain about free content?

PB is like Microsoft, and prefers to beta new iterations of her "robo-arm" product on an unsuspecting populace.

What's this strange feeling? I'm being persuaded by something? That I read? On the Internet?

I doubt the legitimacy of the One True King of Ooo, anyhow. Candy Kingdom forever!

Dude had a really bleak view of relationships.

And that's why you don't try to hold on to your deadbeat father.