Yeah, but they're oddly into androgynous older men with huge packages.

She did indeed improve a lot. Not to the point yet where I'd list her among the greats, but she's good now.

Still on the show according to the Comedy Central page.

I think Samantha Bee and Jason Jones are both solid, dependable correspondents. At least when it comes to the field reports. The in-studio segments with them are as hit-and-miss as they are with everyone else.

As far as I know, Al Madrigal is still officially a correspondent. I know, it doesn't seem like it, because he's never on. I wonder what his deal is.

I think it's absolutely atrocious that they forced Michael Horse to play an offensive Native American stereotype whose last name is an animal.

Won't go into too much else, but that canard that A New Hope was "saved in the editing room" is just something people repeat without actually knowing what it's referring to.

I know this may sound kind of dumb, but I feel like her spirit is still here watching over me.

I have the right to be upset. My mother was killed when she was crushed by an improperly secured practical effect. You insensitive fuck.

Sure, if that's how J.J. Abrams movies tend to stack up in your view.

His character on Firefly was a loudmouthed misogynistic pig with almost no moral scruples to speak of. I don't see how real-life Adam Baldwin could possibly hurt your view of Jayne.

Well, Firefly was pretty Star Wars-y in the first place, so it's not surprising.

So it turns out use of digital effects vs. practical effects actually has very little bearing on whether a movie is good or not. So can everyone please stop jizzing their pants every time J.J. Abrams posts a picture of a papier-mache camel? It won't change the fact that it's a J.J. Abrams movie.

Same. And I'm neither fat, hirsute, nor giving off visible stink lines.

He appears to be the same species as Jack Black.

Okay, but how? You just keep asserting things without backing them up.

I don't think he does encourage civic idiocy, though. Sure, it can sometimes be annoying to hear him get overly self-righteous about something on a comedy program, but he's still generally right, or mostly right. I guess I just don't understand what people are talking about when they say he's as bad as the people he…

One of the great things about the persona is that it meant even the boring guests' interviews were entertaining. Given that a large part of these talk shows consist of interviews with boring celebrities, that could be a real loss.

How is that his fault?

That's a valid defense, though? What Stewart does sort of resembles journalism, but it isn't really. His only obligation is to be funny, and to be honest. Meanwhile, a journalist has an obligation to give a well-rounded, in-depth, and unbiased account of events.