This is such a weird article, particularly the "Little House" suggestion. For a website that takes TV so freakin seriously this is basically one big jokey article about reviving dead shows with wacky twists. I guess a bit of harmless fun, but weird all the same.

I think you could definitely classify it as a good movie. Sure it has some weak spots (script), but as far as disaster movie spectacles it's pretty tough to beat.

Deserved, in my opinion. Titanic, problems and all, is just a classic. The whole final hour (or closer to hour and a half, I believe) is pretty remarkable filmmaking.

Ha, totally forgot that bit. It is a funny one…but of course it's season 3, when the show was reliably funny.

I actually did too…Rim was fucking awesome and I'm a little upset I didn't see it in theaters.

Movie was meh, but Franco was indeed awesome and gave a hugely entertaining performance.

It's not superbly plotted or anything, and I didn't really care much for Bullock to be honest. She's not bad by any means, and certainly has her moments, but at times it felt like the role could have used a different actress. But yes, the main appeal of the film is the FX and how technically impressive it is. It's a…

You forgot to put your shades on, bro.

It was a decent movie but it still just kinda feels like "that Facebook movie" to me.

Yeah I have no problem with movies like Gravity or Avatar winning for cinematography. On that note, Cameron himself proclaimed Gravity to be the best space film he's ever seen, with the best space photography…and obviously to a lot of people it doesn't matter how real it is. I think it should win that category,…

This was probably the closest he's come to playing a (in some ways) comedic character though, which was a nice change of pace, as I don't think he's ever done a straight-up comedy (although I don't remember Catch Me If You Can too well, which seems like it might have had some light-hearted, comedic moments).

I'd say that worked for Avatar as well, to be honest, although I know that's not the most popular opinion. I actually found Avatar and Gravity to be of very similarly quality - wonderful movie going experiences that were visually virtuosic and really pushed the boundaries of special-effects, but both also had…

Yeah…late-Seinfeld isn't as brilliantly masterful as the earlier seasons but it was still one of TV's funniest sitcoms. Was the random put-down to end the review really necessary?

Agree, and even the AV Clubs reviews of it last year analyzed it as a pretty uneven, not-so-great show that didn't live up to it's potential. I guess that's why it was a bit surprising to come on here and see PDN talking as if it was the critical consensus that it was one of the great comedies of last year…then again,…

Yes, fair enough… I deserve the downvotes for such an obscenely nonsensical comment.

Fair enough, but for what it's worth I was taking a pot-shot at the show for constantly bringing up "gas-leak" year. We get it Harmon, you thought it sucked, one reference was enough.

Sorry, but I watched it twice and can't recall a single clever gag. All I remember is Garrets BEAR freakout, which was only notable for its obnoxiousness.

The mug is round. The jar is round. They should call it "Roundtine"!

You're telling me the dark, brooding, mysterious character Carrey played in the classic psychological thriller "The Number 23" didn't get your loins a little fire-y?

Yes, being one of the funniest shows on television (well, at one point) generally helps matters.