You can't know that Chuck is right. At the very moment, he was probably wrong. If Jimmy got the job at HHM and wasn't betrayed by his brother, he might have stayed in Jimmy Land.

The moral of the story: Never come to a job without at least five guns.

Walter White's story is about choices and consequences. Saul's character arc is about obligations and expectations, and his lack of choice is arguably more troubling. Apart from the bribe he later returned, is there any decision he's made this season that isn't defensible? Walt and Saul both decide to become…

Phil can’t stand Todd because Todd is sleeping with Melissa and he's not. That Melissa is charmed by a fat guy makes his failure more maddening. And Todd's sunny disposition adds a dash of self-loathing to the mix. But if Melissa showed no physical interest in Todd, Phil would probably get along with him or at least…

Ray should get a spin-off. Call it "CB1" or just "Ray." But by the end of its run, he's the mayor of New York City.

When Kaylee gets older, she needs to have a long sit-down with Stacey and Pinkman. "About your grandfather…dirty Philly cops…bloody revenge…Pollos…had a good thing…chemistry teacher…nearly executed us … ear flap…Mexico…his guys needed to be taken care of…stupid Wachsberger…go-bag… "

Kind of ticked off at Heisenberg right now.

Detective Hoffman was only trying to do a guy a favor, just like Lydia.

If you're quibbling, a secessionist would hire a constitutional lawyer and the suggestive talking toilet inventor would want an actual patent lawyer. No way they'd consider retaining Saul in real life, even if he is a local hero.

>>>until by the last one, we are literally watching an old woman making her way back to the living room for a solid minute of screen time.>>>
I think the point was to trick the viewer into thinking he's going to leave empty-handed yet again. But this prospective client is different. He can help her and get paid—with…

The episode had fun moments, but as a whole, it felt strained. The humor in this one seemed to come at the expense of structure and momentum when it shouldn't be zero sum. Or at least it wasn't in earlier episodes, which balanced genres more gracefully, weaving them instead of toggling.

Speaking of just judges, I love reading Donna Bowman. Her reviews are first rate — insightful, witty, engaging and fair (she's right about those two montages).

The forum shouldn't be an echo chamber. But it helps to have a sense of humor and an appreciation for satire — or at least a simple understanding of it — to write about South Park. Assigning the show to this guy is like asking a vegan to review a steakhouse. Thurm is out of his depth.