avclub-956705cee098bb08047a4fa54494b367--disqus
Bob Loblaws Law Blog
avclub-956705cee098bb08047a4fa54494b367--disqus

@The Deputy Mayor of Simpleton
I've also seen the writers complain when their quotes were attributed as "The Onion AV Club." I understand, it's their livelihood, and AV Club trying brand themselves as something separate from The Onion," but it's just corporate branding. AV club was started by the Onion. It only

Yeah, once Olbermann left MSNBC they stopped being liberal, All they have left is this right down the middle line up of: Ed Shultz, Rachel Maddow, Chris Matthews and Lawrence O'Donnell

Let me know if it's as good as, "Rational Planning, Reasonable Future."

A little different spin, but one of the worst TV titles ever has to be: Joan of Arcadia

I guess you don't read Jezebel

You know what else was a slow moving show, that took a lot of time to set up a complicated universe in which the context of actions taken by each character were as important as the actions themselves? Deadwood. And it was great. BE is pretty great too, the ratings aren't as good as oh I dunno let's say, True Blood,

I think you mean, bad movies CAUSE cancer, war, and dead babies

"It's the rare filmmaker who realizes that he's only getting richer by making things worse, "
Bad Movies don't make anything worse, they are made because there is a segment of the population that wants to watch those movies and would exist with or with out those bad movies bad movie being made. Also bad movies don't

@ohboy Spielberg has directed some awful movies too, the Lost World, War of the Worlds, Indiana Jones 4 to name a few off the top of my head

My favorite Lionel Hutz moment:

@ what what, I think that the statement 'nothing she does is apolitical' fosters a cartoonish version of her, which I really dislike. I also dislike tea partiers who make cartoonish statements about the President. In any case I don't know if Palin has turned her children into "political props," but if she did,

@ Evil Lincoln: I'm no Palin fan, but "Nothing Sarah Palin does is apolitical, least of all this piece of shit show." is an indefensible comment, it doesn't even make sense within it's own context. Start with the, "Nothing Sarah Palin does is apolitical," that's a blanket statement that I think even Palin's most

I watched the whole season, because once I start something, I like to see it resolved, but the show was not very good. All the, "too smart for TV" opinions this show will get are inevitable, but I did not think was smart show at all. The conspiracy stuff was silly at best and the API stuff was confined to what a TV

let's all take a deep breath and understand that Fox new has the highest ratings of any cable news channel which is just one small slice of how people get their news. The peak audience Fox gets is about 3 million pe0ple or less than on percent of the US. @Clayton's argument of Fox gining up their numbers is specious

Yes, as AMC's original programing has matured, the bar set for "American Movie Classic" seems to have been lowered significantly.

Here's something Douchey
Every time I click on a news wire headline I get sent to the Todd Margret site, I fucking get it, David Cross has a new show on IFC, it's probably good, but fuck, man am I less and less likely to watch it when I don't click on it and I'm redirected.

Tromack:
I won't defend Levitt's character, I have no idea if he's an egomaniac, but as for your "b" assertion, "It is his type of research that leads to such proclamations as "A high fiber diet reduces your risk of prostate cancer,"" When I read Freakonomics a few years back it seemed to me that it was just this type

Yeah, other than the plot, pacing, dialogue, and direction it's really not so bad.

I wouldn't mind kissing that man between the cheeks, so to speak…

I'd like you to come in for a phaeton reading