maybe i just need a break? i freak out at the response i get from posting the most innocuous shit sometimes.
maybe i just need a break? i freak out at the response i get from posting the most innocuous shit sometimes.
*sees anne hathaway, does something unmentionable*
*sees anne hathaway, does something unmentionable*
mine are caked with shit, as usual.
mine are caked with shit, as usual.
yeah, but did you hate disqus when you were a kid?
yeah, but did you hate disqus when you were a kid?
woo! you're almost as old as me!
woo! you're almost as old as me!
pretty sure that the "archive" titles are all very bare-bones dvr's. which blows, IMO.
pretty sure that the "archive" titles are all very bare-bones dvr's. which blows, IMO.
nothing major, just that i've never found amy poehler funny. figured if i posted it somebody would (or a few somebodys) freak out as if i'd just killed their fuckin' grandparents or something.
nothing major, just that i've never found amy poehler funny. figured if i posted it somebody would (or a few somebodys) freak out as if i'd just killed their fuckin' grandparents or something.
i thought he was ok in 'philadelphia', no more.
um, ok.
late but correct.
fuck people who take you to task for innocuous shit like posting too much. really.
hanks is the only good thing about 'the ladykillers' and even if the accent was a bit wack, he's hilarious in 'catch me'. if i have a problem with the guy, it's that he seems to be in over his head when he's in completely serious stuff.
and there was much rejoicing. (yay.)
i'd just like to say that lobsters1 is indeed a piece of shit.