It's weird. He was driving drunk which is bad. She was standing up for her drunk driving husband which was bad. But then he didn't stand up for his drunk raving wife who was standing up for his stupid ass and I feel that that's kinda bad also.
It's weird. He was driving drunk which is bad. She was standing up for her drunk driving husband which was bad. But then he didn't stand up for his drunk raving wife who was standing up for his stupid ass and I feel that that's kinda bad also.
I would think it would be one giant circle representing ~90% of the people on Earth with internet access surrounding a much smaller circle of AV club people.
I honestly legitimately laughed at an intentional joke in the Big Bang parody, which is obviously more than can be said for the show.
Also, it's not like characters on tv ever actually finish their drinks or food before running off onto the next plot point.
Also in one episode they took an airplane somewhere. Airplanes travel at several hundred miles per hour. Going from that speed to a full stop nearly instantly (which we'll assume happened) would surely kill them. So what the fuck show?
I agree, I actually think they're probably going to be great. But I really think that the expectations are just too high for the reception to be overly positive. Even if it is, it'll always be sort of 'yeah they were good, but not as good as the original.' There will always be that disclaimer thrown in.
It's true though, these are going to be the biggest letdowns in entertainment history. This is going to make The Phantom Menace debacle look good. And I'm not saying that these will be bad episodes in any way, they'll probably be great and just as good as the originals (or not, I can't say for sure), but the nerd…
That sounds like a fancy ass blockbuster. Where I grew up, they were lucky to keep the lane dividing lines on the roads visible after all the snow, gravel, and salt that piled up during winter.
There's probably been more actors playing Rusty in 4 or 5 movies than James Bond in 20 some movies.
Don't worry about the gas money, we've got Mr. Fusion. Just throw some garbage in the tank and we're good to go.
Oh yeah, I remember ordering a plate of cheap wings and one broke when I was only half done and I was like "That's the end of that then". And my friends called me a pussy and I was like "Fuck it, these things are like McDonalds hamburgers, it doesn't take much to push them from 'delicious' to 'completely disgusting'"
Remember 'snake bites' in elementary school? When someone would grab your arm by both hands and twist the hands in opposite directions and it was like the worst torture for a 7 year old ever? Well, apparently guys love it when girls do that in bed (and not just to their arms..).
That we're supposed to feel sympathy for any rich person with tax trouble just seems like a weird thing to waste your sympathy on. Do conservatives really feel sympathy for these people? I mean, I know you say you do, but deep down, are you really, truly upset that a person that makes 1.8 million dollars, really…
Yeah, that's what I'm thinking. Like what if his/her mom is like really cheap and the only reason she lets them have netflix is cause it's free. And then it's gone and she's like 'well, tough shit junior, go do your homework'.
No doubt, my list is pretty schizo too. Recommended for you: 'Wonder Pets', 'Nazis at the Center of the Earth', 'My little Pony', 'Autoerotic', 'Chuck and friends', 'Sexual chronicles of a french family' (Someone in our household went on a bit of a erotic indie binge one night apparently)
I would say keep it active for the kid's sake. That shit is like crack to them and a loss of netflix for even a few days would be catastrophic. It's really healthiest to encourage their addiction in this case.
Well, apparently it's a good thing that, in this case, my common sense out weighed the law that I made up in my head.
I think I've heard that in Canada you only have to buckle the number of people that there are available seat belts for. So if you're in a sedan with five seat belts, but driving 10 people around, only five need to be wearing them. Which seems perfectly reasonable right? Like there's no other law that could be…
I also seem to be missing something about the drug charges too. It sounds like he was arrested, taken to jail with drugs, and then charged with bringing drugs into jail. Like he had a choice in the matter. I mean, yeah, he had a choice about having the drugs in the first place, but that doesn't seem to be the…
Until you get into an accident with them and they die and then you have to live with that.