avclub-90c88bf435e7bdafcb26109a12313c7d--disqus
Bubbles
avclub-90c88bf435e7bdafcb26109a12313c7d--disqus

I'm almost positive my soul dies a little every time one of these sequel threads occurs and it gets to electric boogaloo or whatever the fuck it is.

I'm sure that if there's one thing that professional movie critics hate it's people making more movies.

I love how your correction gets a like, but your original comment doesn't.

Can't tell if Captain Cool's comment is sarcasm or not.

Admit it, it was already sitting at zero.

Is that even really a threat?  He just explained the circumstances under which said killing would occur.  He never said he was going to kill anyone.  

I can think of a show that was good….

Now you've used the edit button and replied to your post correcting it.  Now we're even more confused.  Way to go.

Also known as Ghostbusters 3.

I'm saddened that it took till page 2 of the comments for a variation of this to be said.

I don't think it's a question of which is better.  I think it should still exist.  Whatever problems it has originally are part of it.

You say that Star Wars is important from a visual effects standpoint, which is exactly the problem in my view.  By inserting 2000s visual effects into a movie that is historically significant primarily because it had groundbreaking effects in 1977, we lose that history.  It's modifying the time capsule that showcases

Yeah, that's what I'm saying.  Give me the original Mona Lisa and I promise I'll only change 1% of it and see what havoc I can cause.

Also, why would Greedo have to track down Solo in the cantina and get shot if Jabba was just going to go meet him outside his ship 5 minutes later?

There's also some updated spaceship special effects (which obviously don't match the 80s special effects), they changed Boba Fett's voice, changed some dialogue for no reason, and added an unneeded scene of Darth Vader leaving cloud city.

Yeah, but part of it is a sort of history of film argument.  You saw them in their original format and you're fine with that, but in 50 years when movie critics and history students look back at the culture of the 1970s and 1980s there will be a large gap in appreciating the popular movies of that time because some of

I bought the blu rays of 4, 5 and 6 also.  Stupid Walmart having them for $35.  Then you rationalize in your head that really like literally 99% of the movies are exactly the same as the originals.  But that extra 1% really fucks things up.

'Well don't try to blame me.  I'm an interpreter, I'm not supposed to know the difference between a power socket and a computer terminal.'

"I'm fuzzy on the whole good-bad thing.  What do you mean by bad?"

How could you buy a ticket for something better?