avclub-8a0165299c27c4a0f44be8887783cf0e--disqus
Larrybaby
avclub-8a0165299c27c4a0f44be8887783cf0e--disqus

I'd just like to point out that the PTC would be a good ally for people complaining about how they have to order HBO in order to watch Game of Thrones on their computers.  Both groups are annoyed that you're subsidizing crap you hate for the sake of getting what you actually like.,

So who played the lady doc?  Was it Markie Post?  Was it Markie Post?  It was Markie Post, wasn't it?  Was it Markie Post?

I think I post this every time someone mentions the Hangover movies, but I cannot fathom how so many people describe part II as a "carbon copy" of part one.

The characters are there, to some extent, but I actually disagree that they were pretty fully-formed by this point.  Some of the more interesting refinements took a lot longer to show up, and their absence makes early Friends episodes much less enjoyable to me.

There is nothing about this story that isn't awesome.

I just want to point out — and probably join the ranks of others who have said the same — that this is one of my all-time favorite headline/photo combinations.

Sometimes I think about the movies that were released in 1999 and my mind utterly melts.

Agreed.  I only used Wittgenstein because the concept of language as a picture of reality seemed the most obvious parallel.  But Wittengestein also allowed that if you can't say it, you can't write it, and you certainly can't make a movie out of it.  No matter how much awesome slo-mo kicking it has.

Inevitably pretentious comment:

I think the chief difference is that the incident on the set of The Crow did not involve illegal child labor.  That, and the fact that it didn't involve the deaths of two children, neither of whom could have done anything to save themselves.  The Crow is much easier to see as "a tragic thing that happened" while the

Yeah, ditto.  It's an outrageous story, and it sickens me that Landis was never punished.  The degree of Spielberg's culpability is harder to determine — whether or not he was on set at the time, or has some legal obligation as producer, it still ultimately was Landis who drove this situation. 

I DARE you to make less sense!

I can only tell Jon Snow and Robb Stark apart because one is typically surrounded by ice.  Before Snow went to the Wall, I honestly couldn't tell who was who.

Last night's episode also blew me away in that I really wanted to see Jaime toss Locke into the bear pit, and just a few episodes ago all I wanted was to see Jaime's head on a spike.

I'm fairly sure you're right.  For awhile I was thinking that it was Theon's dad behind it all, trying to make his son a proper Iron Born, make him pay the Iron Price, all that kinda stuff.

Wasn't Loeb also on Angel season 5?   If not earlier seasons?

I disagree about Theon.  I seem to have a different reaction to every aspect of his storyline from most people, but I think the torture scenes work.  They're cheap and manipulative, but they're effective.  They're horror.  You have to like that kind of thing to enjoy it, but if you DO like that sort of thing, they've

So confusing you called Theon "Tyrion" by mistake, as I imagine I'm not the first to point out…

Awesome!

Ha — I enjoy the fact that these two episodes are in some ways the opposite of what TZ normally does, and I hadn't noticed that before.  Yes, your initial suspicions of someone who is different, maybe even better, than you are probably correct.  For the love of god, be wary of kind strangers who show up and do nice