avclub-85d8ce590ad8981ca2c8286f79f59954--disqus
sacrelicious
avclub-85d8ce590ad8981ca2c8286f79f59954--disqus

I just got an "attempted clickjacking" warning from my noscript when I clicked on the live chat window. this isn't a huge deal for me, cause I prefer the comments section anyway, but just thought you guys should know.

no, nobody has made that joke yet.

Fox News, and especially Fox Business News are the most serious threat to American capitalism in the media today.

you would make a great mob lawyer. you'd get more mobsters convicted than any prosecutor ever could.

so then you agree that the context in which the potentially deadly thing is owned is relevant to why it was in the suspects possession? motive and opportunity to commit the murder adds additional color to the fact that the person owned the same substance used to commit said murder? much in the same way that having a

and if it were legalized that would suddenly change the relevance of that fact overnight?

what? what kind of absurd logic is that? that's basically spin doctor apologism. anything I can twist your words into is what you have said? THAT. IS. INSANE!

are you functionally illiterate, or do you simply choose not to read arguments you've decided to disagree with?

Next time, on The Detective Allen Thomas Mysteries:

I don't know which is more astonishing: you circular logic, or your failure to recognize how circular your logic is.

there's nothing illegal about owning a basement sex dungeon either. but if you have been caught molesting children, suddenly that basement sex dungeon takes on a whole new relevance.

oh, so now you're pretty sure that the article is limited strictly to the relevant information are ya?

just because he's not being charged with gun crimes does not mean that the guns are irrelevant to the story. merely irrelevant to the legal case against him. which is something that perhaps ought to be remedied.

no, I am inferring that a grenade launcher can be loaded with an explosive, and is owned by somebody capable of firing and blowing up said explosive. both of these I believe are fairly obvious inferences. unless of course you are arguing that the ability to load granade launchers with, you know, GRENADES is an

"my own shadow doesn't contain a high explosive projectile."

there's a subtle difference between grenade launchers and my own shadow: my own shadow doesn't contain a high explosive projectile.

grenade launchers don't tear a person's limbs to shreds, cause them to quickly bleed out with only a pull of a trigger, people tear a person's limbs to shreds causing them to quickly bleed out with only the pull of a trigger!

we should submit a ticket to the devs.

yeah, but next to 1000 pot plants it really starts to sound more like a business expense.

I think having a grenade launcher and 9000 rounds of ammunition *is* more scary and sinister.