So has God, apparently!
So has God, apparently!
Yeah, and for looking at dad's dong while he's passed out, Noah curses the son who did so. Which makes no sense, because even by Old Testament standards you wouldn't curse your son because he thought it was funny that you took a dirt nap with your pants down. Hence biblical scholars interpreting Ham's transgression as…
Paging Lot, brother of Abraham, and his daughters…let's talk series, you crazy freaks.
The curse of Ham part of the story has been (mis-)used for years as the justification for slavery. Because Ham laughed at his dad when he was passed out drunk, all of his descendants logically deserve to be the slaves of his brother's descendants. God, fresh from killing off nearly all of humanity, says, "Sounds about…
The Bible beat you to it. Seriously. One interpretation of Noah's curse of Ham is that Ham raped his own mother (Noah's wife) while dad was drunk. The exact phrase, I believe, is that he "took his (Noah's) manhood," which various people translate as a euphemism for raped his woman, or raped him, or castrated him. It's…
I don't want to overly defend Mink Car—that and Factory Showroom were the last TMBG albums I bought before I lost interest in the band and stopped buying their music—but it's got some high points: Another First Kiss, Mink Car, and Working Undercover for the Man are solid, and I always laugh at Wicked Little Critta.…
Actually, I'm pretty sure most of the stunts in that movie are CGI.
I once saw an interview with the stuntman who doubled for Keaton in A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum. For years, this guy couldn't tell anyone about that job, because apparently stuntmen worship Keaton like a god and never would have…
Langella was quite the bit of alright in his earlier years. Check him out in The Twelve Chairs.
I just rewatched that movie a couple of weekends ago. There are a few a stunts that I still have no idea how Keaton pulled off. Just an astounding movie, and yeah, like 48 minutes long.
I am so totally done with literacy. Last year's fad, man.
Dracula (1931) wouldn't just lose something without Lugosi, it would lose everything. He's the only good thing about that movie. His performance has been parodied a million times, but he did a pretty spectacular job with it. The only other thing I remember about it is that the guy who plays Renfield is unintentionally…
THANK YOU! Please enjoy my thunderous applause.
I cried when Mauser's hands got glued to his head. Tears of sadness, tears of joy; a bit of both, really.
Porno is the genitive; porn is the dative. The ablative is "prong."
Is that why you clearly lack a bleegot on your glunzor? All of us have them, but maybe in the dimension you come from they are unknown…
So what you're saying is, it's not the classic you remember it to be.
That's what I remember too. I recall sitting in the theater thinking, "Oh, so I guess they didn't really save the city in the first one."
I came here for references to hammers. O'Neal would have had three in the headline alone. Now that's WRITING.
C'mon, Primer. I still need someone to explain that movie to me (which doesn't mean I didn't like it).
Yeah, I would have loved it if he had played more heroes now and then. You really get caught up in his justified panic in this movie.