avclub-7f4069db8c7d02ea9f8984a3962d5eef--disqus
LOAD asterisk comma 8 comma 1
avclub-7f4069db8c7d02ea9f8984a3962d5eef--disqus

So…you don't have footage of someone almost getting hit by a bus? Back to youtube for me.

Holy crap, thank you for that. It's one of those videos where I didn't really understand why I was laughing so hard but I didn't want to overthink it.

Well by that logic they could have called him Cock Man. Well, no I guess they couldn't since I've already taken that name. But hey, my point still stands.

That game is great, although I still haven't figured out what a "Guts Man" is.

No shit, isn't this basically just some sort of historical fan fiction? I've never understood why they keep retelling very recent stories, often with the major players all still alive, in a completely fictional way. Moneyball and Argo come to mind. Are they not doing a massive disservice by not starting these movies

I misunderstood and thought we were talking about Efron.

This crap probably pays him four times as much. When it's unclear if you are going to break out you probably have to make the tough choice between the more lucrative projects or carefully plotting and nourishing your career.

He must be doing it for his family. If I were a multi-millionaire at age 70 I certainly wouldn't be wasting my time doing what are objectively shitty movies just for a few million more. I would consider it if I were donating it to charity to ease my conscience after a well-lived life of excess and debauchery, or doing

It's just a clever marketing thing for Blizzard. They probably wanted to be as inoffensive as possible, and just grab a little attention.

Downvoted.

I miss downvoting. There was something satisfying about watching some idiot take the full scorn of internet democracy. Unless I was on some right wing news site, in which case it was just super depressing to watch a reasonable comment about maybe considering minor gun control reform getting a million downvotes, while

He really acts like a piece of white trash. Which based on where he's from I guess he actually is.

Jesus clearly said there were only two commandments, so why are we even reading the Ten Commandments?

Your post does contain the primary issue here - whether what Dawkins proposes, on twitter or otherwise, is wrong or okay. But this particular thread evolved into a discussion on whether Dawkins clearly said it was immoral not to, and regardless of subsequent elaborations the unmistakable conclusion from his twitter

This argument makes no sense. It's like if I tweet that we should invade iran and it's wrong not to, and then later elaborated by saying that perhaps from one point of view we should attack Iran, but it's an issue that requires further analysis. One is not an elaboration on another. He was not restricted by 140

His twitter comment is not a simplified expression of the beliefs he gives on his website for the simple reason the two are entirely incompatible. He backtracked, plain and simple.

The quote you pulled seems like an obvious bit of backtracking. It is entirely inconsistent with what he tweeted, and is full of uncertainty. It "might" be immoral, from one perspective. And this requires further discussion. But when you read his tweet it's obvious he's not being conditional. I think the best

It actually looks like a really crappy cover. Like something a talented high school student would sketch during home room.

In fairness to the American legal system, the only pleadings I seem to ever read are quoted by O'Neal and relate to bizarre and sensationalistic cases that generally come across as a money grab by a shady and unscrupulous lawyer. Another big difference in our legal systems is that the professionalism and quality

As a Canadian lawyer I'm often quite amused and blown away by the very colloquial way in which american pleadings are drafted. They are very conversational and sensational in a way that would get you yelled at up here, or would actually severely prejudice your claim because the judge would assume you are just an