I'd say the closer thing to this would be if the man admitted to liking BDSM. You might as well use a man saying he enjoys having sex with women as evidence he's a rapist. What Cosby admitted to doing would be horrible if he did it without the women's consent, but he phrases it in a way that suggests he had it.

A trial for a decades-old instance of a crime that's incredibly hard to prove beyond a reasonable doubt even under better circumstances?

He's on record admitting to giving drugs to women before they had sex, but I don't think he admitted to drugging them without their knowledge, or having sex with them while they were unconscious. There's a world of difference between "two people take drugs then have sex" and date rape.

Turns out, if the jury has to be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that someone committed a crime, you might need more than eyewitness testimony where the two sides fundamentally disagree. And while Cosby has said that he bought drugs to give to women, he never said he did it to have sex with them while they were…

Blaming the recent victims of a shooting? Real tasteful.

And to be honest, I don't see a ton of parallels between Trump and Caesar other than the obvious desire for power and big ego. It doesn't sound like incisive commentary, just a three hour SNL sketch.

To be fair, the controversial stuff is mostly new. It's not like they're just complaining about Shakespeare's choices.

I think there's just something about the character of Indiana Jones specifically that works better with a male protagonist. A woman could do the same thing, and be a fantastic character, but I'm not sure it would be Indy. Like how a man can be tough, determined, and have a deep love for his child, but if Kill Bill had…

I'd say a B- is a fairly positive AV Club score. B- to me is "below-average Brooklyn 99 episode".

I'd say neither concept is inherently sexist, since it works pretty much the same both ways. It's just weirdly callous.

I'd say most of the big moments are from the dinosaurs themselves. From the guys you've mostly got the chaos theory speech and maybe Muldoon's final moments.

Sure, they can be all those things. Marian from the first film certainly fills all those categories. But I wouldn't want Marian taking his place.

Nedry's death wasn't exactly great.

I'd say Jurassic Park is relatively even, gender-wise. But honestly, most of Spielberg's better films just work better with men in the lead. Indiana Jones needed someone like Harrison Ford.

We know Jimmy doesn't meet Gus, right? In Breaking Bad he seemed to only be vaguely aware of Gus' existence.

Maybe they just thought it looks good? A huge chunk of women's grooming and makeup-type stuff seems to be more aimed at other women than at men.

It raises flags? So can no one say something is bad? Do I have to act like I'm delighted that Big Bang Theory and Two Broke Girls are around or risk judgment?

Luke's kind of a whiny idiot for A New Hope. He didn't really improve much until ESB, and even then the film basically ends with him getting his ass kicked.

I think there's an argument that they might be a bit overdone at this point, same as zombies.

Wait, a pharaoh? That seems like a random choice for a go-to baddie.