Are you kidding? I don't have time to both separately in the morning! Why wouldn't you brush your teeth in the shower?

Republicans working with Sanders would stop the second he enters the White House. On the other hand, he'll have more of a voice in the Senate, where there's at least a measure on congeniality remaining (not to mention the possibility of the Democrats winning it back). Sanders is far more valuable in the Senate than…

Says the person worried about Hilary's 'serial dishonesty'???

It's a great running/workout track.

TAD

Red Lorry Yellow Lorry, 'Only Dreaming (Wide Awake)'
Heaven 17, 'Contenders'
Haujobb, 'Kilo-Cycle Respirator'
Abecedarians, 'John's Pop'
The Cosmetics, 'The Crack (Long Version)'
Pixies, 'Debaser (Demo 2)'
X Marks the Pedwalk, 'The Occurence'
The Go-Betweens, 'Twin Layers of Lightning'
Giorgio Moroder, 'Chase'
Le Mystere Des…

As with a lot of Apatow-esque comedies, the problem itself isn't so much the length, but that at some point the movie stops being funny. Comedies don't need to become dramas in the third act. If Trainwreck ended after Colin Quinn's character died it would have been perfect.

I think it still has a lot of salience. The running gags about ubiquitous advertising and how everyone and everything has some corporate branding get truer by the day. And I don't quite think we've recovered from the overt anti-intellectualism of the Bush years.

'Neither party serves me.'

Exactly. In our current political climate this sort of humor is 'partisan' in a way this article doesn't account for.

Yes, the home state fallacy. Here's the thing: Gore lost TN because he'd become too liberal for the state. So, if you believe this, you're arguing he should have moved *right* just to win his home state?

Both parties reflect the preferences of their members. If you want a party to cater to your political beliefs, join it and change it from within. It's worked for the Republicans over the last 50 years. But we ain't in George Washington's day, and there will never be support to sustain a third party.

Here's the problem I have with this essay: it assumes that 'neutral political satire' in an unambiguous good. Towards the end the author shuts down the possibility of partisan satire, calling it 'a tad heavy-handed'. Certainly partisan satire can be heavy-handed (any satire can be), but I wouldn't use those examples…

' It’s a two-party system, after all, and the invaders liken voting for a third-party candidate to throwing your vote away. '

Hey, Topeka's in the good part of Kansas. Use Great Bend or Colby instead.

Touch Me, I'm Dick

I can't disagree with much in this review. On the upside, I think they have a good season 2 set up. On the downside, all the trite mob nonsense in this episode serves as a reminder of how much potential this season wasted. I think the pilot was the strongest episode of the season, matched only by the non-mob parts of…

Yeah, Squirrel Nut Zippers were a thing. Bleak, bleak times.

Compromise: meh.

He was fine during the hearings (I watched them live too) but–and the film is right to focus on this–he got rolled in just about every other aspect of the hearings. I think there was also a feeling that he didn't quite trust Hill. Eleanor Holmes Norton was on NPR talking about the female congressional delegation (led…