avclub-7d26c14b4a096a0afc48154974c4b7d6--disqus
Iaimtomisbehave
avclub-7d26c14b4a096a0afc48154974c4b7d6--disqus

Another explanation is that academic qualifications have zero to do with empathy or morality, and don't even necessarily correlate directly with intelligence. It means she got into a school and put in enough work to earn a piece of paper, not that she's some great thinker.

Goddamnit.

People think she adopts kids from third world countries as a publicity stunt. Because making an eighteen year investment in a child is the easiest way to cozy up to the press, apparently.

Jolie: "Don't get me wrong. When principal photography is over, kid's going to jail."

It's worth a watch. Very tongue-in-cheek - not all that dissimilar from your description of Cabin Fever. It was on Hulu for free the last I knew.

Knock Knock was damn entertaining and features a hilarious Keanu Reeves performance. I don't mind Roth. He seems to genuinely love making movies, and that comes through in even some of his lesser work.

Yeah, I remember enjoying it, too. It's no Total Recall, but it's a fun little sci fi action flick.

*Audience quiets down, Hulu goes to speak, immediately cuts to commercial break*

"Write what you know" should come with an asterisk that says You can learn new things.

Would you really consider those to be action films, though? The only Big Twist action film that comes immediately to mind for me is Total Recall. Actually, The 6th Day had a twist, too. (Maybe it's an Arnold thing.)

Have they? John Wick is largely acclaimed for differing from standard action formula in that it does have style. Same for this film. Most I can think of from recent years are known for their generic, vaguely Bourne-aping camerawork. I guess there are franchises like Fast and Furious known for their big stunts and

And the number of female characters to two.

You got me. Trey Parker and Matt Stone are cowards who are terrified of losing a theoretically significant audience of Trump supporters. Never mind that they've skewered him plenty before, or that they publicly expressed a perfectly valid reason for wanting to move on to other topics. What is your assertion,

This is actually something that the show was often praised for in its earlier years. It later grew to feel like a bit of a copout, and I think Parker gradually realized that "both sides suck" as a blanket approach isn't always effective—recent seasons seem to be trying for a more nuanced argument, based on what I've

It also doesn't add up that the South Park creators are partly responsible for the rise of the alt-right while also being partly responsible for "both sides are equally bad" political apathy. I'm far from a religious fan of the show, but it seems to me a lot of people here are doing backflips to throw Parker and co.

"Big Gay Al's Big Gay Boat Ride."

Highly, highly doubt the guys who've gone out of their way to piss off half of Hollywood are super concerned with playing nice with Trump supporters. I genuinely believe that it really is fatigue that led to their decision, even if I share Sean's disappointment that they won't be tackling it.

I've never seen the episode, but I love this description and comment.

Did that happen or is it just something you want to see?

Dude, I love Hancock!