As someone who loves how the show ended, I can completely understand people hating the entire series because of it. I don't have the reaction with Lost but I completely do with Battlestar Galactica.
As someone who loves how the show ended, I can completely understand people hating the entire series because of it. I don't have the reaction with Lost but I completely do with Battlestar Galactica.
Not all lions?
I told them how many times, they need locking mechanisms on the vehicle windows!
He betrayed the watch in a meeting he had called under the guise of discussing the misprinted Night's Watch calendars.
I like it for the joke of ANOTHER Seamus vs Bryan match, dislike it because my initial reaction was, "I doubt Bryan will ever compete in the ring again."
After "Cheney Returns to Camp Crystal Lake" I was sure that they wouldn't ever be able to do anything nearly as hilarious with his successor. I'm glad that I was wrong and don't plan on underestimating them again.
Pro-tip: just adapt The Long Halloween for season 2. It's not like the show cares about continuity with the comics anyway and then it might be watchable.
I get you, the Nightmare on Elm St remake can still be a sterling example of a bad remake without being as bad as the Footloose remake. But then I'm not calling either the "epitome" (which would probably be The Fog). As far as remakes go, while this one has it's issues, it's actually pretty middle of the road. It's…
No way is it the epitome. I can think of a dozen far worse remakes off the top of my head. No kidding, I counted them, realized three would be really controversial and came up with three replacements almost as quick.
Nothing can stop Axelmania!
I don't get Blake and Murphy. And this isn't me saying "I see what they have going, it's just not for me," I really, 100% don't get what the hell is going on there. In such a well written show, they are one of two things that are really, REALLY poorly written *cough*BaronCorbin*cough* (Corbin's heel turn is at least…
Insidious 2 explained too much. There were good sections, and I liked that certain sections that didn't completely make sense in the first movie were explained, but it was disappointing. And I like Patrick Wilson to a degree, but I think not having him going forward isn't necessarily a bad thing.
It's kind of crazy, I remember first seeing that effect in the first, extremely low budget Paranormal Activity. I have seen the effect countless times since, and none of them have looked better, or even as good as how they did it in a $25,000 movie.
Comparisons to Insidious might have tempted me to give this a look, if it weren't for the fact that an actual Insidious movie is coming out in a couple weeks.
No, @ElDan is right, I write off shows with terrible endings completely. It almost seems worse to me that a show maintain a high level of quality all along but has a completely unsatisfactory ending. Stories in general, actually.
… okay, that's kind of cool casting news at least, but can I just get a less limited printing of the first remake on Blu-ray?
The article also makes a damn good point about how certain shows actually teach bad behavior. My girlfriend has a particular aversion to Jesse which she views as little more than the world's absolute worst babysitter and kids going around being smart asses to all the authority figures without consequences while being…
I'm kind of assuming that. He is really heavy on dark fantasy, even his other ghost story, Devil's Backbone, really isn't a horror movie.
Speak for yourself, Pacific Rim is one of the most fun, entertaining movies in years, and I'm stoked for the sequel and the cartoon. And despite the CGI overload, I'm looking forward to Crimson Peak and know quite a few other people who are as well.
Gay boys becoming gay men; gay men becoming gay wolves.