I saw the mediocre reviews of this, so haven't put in the time and finally watched the first. C- is about right. How many times in one episode can Ward and Joy have the same conversation about whether he is or isn't the real Danny?

there's a reason why real trials can take weeks to complete. I'm not that bad, but then again I've not had that kind of trial. I could've kept Howard up on the stand all day.

I'm sure Gus' chickens are happy right up til the last day of their lives

and the bagels

there was plenty of time to lose weight after the Sopranos ended though, before his heart attack. Though habits do die hard and it's less easy to lose the older you get

I liked it overall, though the trap set by Jimmy wasn't quite what I expected. It was in fact, more straighforward and effective, not to mention damaging to Chuck, than I guessed it would be.

Well, look, I'm not in any hurry to see Saul, but I remember that he has a whole life and client base that Walter never knew. We could get Saul tomorrow and still have 3 more seasons before BB

Legal. Even taking something from his pocket if you then show you had no intention of keeping it or permanently depriving the owner of it can be legal.

I'd guess yes. Home office if you will.

well, I'm still doing mostly misdemeanors. So I haven't had a case yet where someone else might've done it and my client is left making that choice like that.
Closest I've come is a felony battery with brass knuckles. Client facing up to 6 years in prison. I had witnesses to say they didn't see brass knuckles, and a…

though it unfortunately no longer streams on netflix. they let the license lapse or syfy didn't renew it before I could finish the run. bastards.

except the billboard was just a well endowed supergirl torso. let the objectification continue.*

I have had clients who were sorry for their actions, regretful of the harm they had done in a moment of poor decision making or when things got out of hand for them. I've also had clients who were sorry they got caught, or that the situation they were in escalated the way it did.

Here's the thing, though - 90%+ of cases don't go to trial. They are plead out. So the court doesn't have all that information. what the court has is the criminal complaint - which is one sided point of view, the plea and agreement between the attorneys, the context of events explained by the defense and prosecution…

I thought he was was the upright one, not the plow itself, but your interpretation makes even more interesting

a turf war between a viking gang leader and a native american mafia boss - set in colorado and being filmed (or not) in canada. the book description calls is a black comedy, and I wondered from the description if it was some sort of parody, or maybe a dark comedy ala fargo.

I figured. ;) THe other appropriate reply on my part would have been a query as to how you'd know the sister likes the act, and that's more a a savage love post than anything else.

to me, it is explicit in that the speaker thinks trump is a poor speaker - his mouth is only good for one thing

sounds like you married the wrong sister to me, or maybe your wife has other redemptive qualities

Apologies, either written or verbal, certainly fall within the scope of "appropriate behavior" though, and is often part of the plea negotiation. The DA can "ask" for anything. Whether they get it is another story, and it doesn't obligate the other party to anything.