avclub-78b255022ebef6b2aeb98205438657d2--disqus
Bats in Hats
avclub-78b255022ebef6b2aeb98205438657d2--disqus

You're forgetting the best line of the night!
When Cameron is telling the camera what a traditional family they are, and Mitchell says "Yeah, that's what the disabled lesbian shaman who blessed Lily's room said."

Holy shit, John Barleycorn, I think you hit the nail on the head!

True that. I *loved* Anthony's collection, even the outfits that were a little crazy. Interesting when the decoys upstage the real ones, no?

@Vardulon — I know, right? It's just so preposterous! This show enrages me with how good it could have been.

I was actually a bit disappointed in this episode — for me it was an A episode dragged down to a B+, because of just too many little things that interfered with my willing suspension of disbelief. Why is it that I'm OK with alternate universes, but not with labs full of identical metronomes and tuning forks? I

Walter 2 is on his way to get his boy.

Fuck blogs, I want all my intelligent LOST discourse on one site. I always look forward to reading Lone's essays, especially since I can find them AT THE SAME PLACE that I find Noel's review. Also, when I don't want to read them, I have this magical page down button on the keyboard…

I don't buy for a second that Lone would be surreptitiously posting spoilers in order to make himself look smart.

Default, I had the exact reaction as you — his decision to get in that car was quite intentional. I'm not sure if, for me, it quite hits "Clyde Bruckman" proportions, but it ain't too far off. And I love the ambiguity there, that we don't know Peck's intentions or motivations, but that we each have to fill it in.

I don't care what anyone says Lone, I enjoy reading your posts.

You're a good man, David Sims
Thanks for sitting through this shit, so that I know that I don't have to.

@Professor Snugglesworth: excellent points indeed. And perhaps the bleedthrough between realities goes both ways. When Desmond said "you're John Locke" in such a weird way, at first I thought he meant "you ain't John Locke" but now I think he means BOTH. It's not Locke, but Locke is increasingly bleeding through.