In the words of Peter Griffin, it insists upon itself.

Except she obviously enjoyed it, so?

No argument here.

#FuckTheBard

I mean, Macbeth abandoned a lot of realism when Malcolm hides a whole army behind some tree branches, but nobody is giving Shakespeare any flak about it.

As a cool formal exercise, it was great TV.

It's possible to both disagree with Assad's war crimes and with Trump unilaterally deciding to blow up 60 tomahawk missiles in Syria.

You know, I think there is actually a pertinent and important contrast to draw between the aesthetics of a missile launch and the (often equally-fetishized) destruction they cause.

Hey as long as you recognize you're in the deep minority on that, you do you.

Pete is a miserable, hilarious, tortured, clown of a tragedy. He's one of most sympathetic, detestable characters I've ever seen.

Hmm, I think there's a couple of different conversations going on here.

Hey, that's the name of the show!

The problem with this answer is it presupposes that David is a character, with specific, defining traits that Legion had any interest in developing, instead of simply being a cipher for the show to try out cool formal experiments and showcase Aubrey Plaza.

This is a bad take. Even when Walt was "cartoon evil" it was a product of his deep seeded inferiority complex and mostly bluster. See: His meeting with the skinheads planning the jail murders.

I'll admit that all of HIMYM is a slurry in my memory, but I remember Barney being the instant breakout character, no?

If half the shows in existence fit this criteria that means the other half don't? Which actually makes this a perfect question?

But she's a woman!!

30 Rock is a (brilliant, hall-of-fame) joke delivery machine, so actually it does.

Are you referring to Milpool?

Lane winning that fight is actually evidence that Pete is a better character though?