avclub-773fc3013fec43c958724a25b7dcb360--disqus
weej
avclub-773fc3013fec43c958724a25b7dcb360--disqus

That's one of the lazy hollywood cliches that get on my nerves. The protagonist always has to be in control. Life's just not like that.

Because Baby Jesus hates you, and your stinking comments.

The bit where she comes out of the tvwas about ten times as frightening in the original.

I read the title, did you read that section?

I read the title, did you read that section?

I read the title, did you read that section?

Only if by "more focussed" you mean "feels that it needs to spell the whole thing out for you instead of crediting you with some intelligence and imagination".
The story was the same.

Great.
Press the button once, reply thrice. Nice coding there.

Great.
Press the button once, reply thrice. Nice coding there.

The Ring
I'm sorry, The Ring remake better than the original? What?
That's possibly the most ridiculous thing I've ever read on here.

The Ring
I'm sorry, The Ring remake better than the original? What?
That's possibly the most ridiculous thing I've ever read on here.

I quite like the Genesis one,
and a couple of others aren't too bad.
Maybe I just have no taste. The last few are appalling, even to me.

They are robots from the future.

What is it with "Ska Punk" bands and rubbish cover versions? Is there some law that they have to play a certain quota?
Don Drummond is spinning in his grave.

The Specials really were not a Northern Soul band. Really.

The Slits version is even better than the original.

Well, for starters
If someone broke into my house and forced me at gunpoint to name my top ten all time favorite cover versions I'd start with the Slits version of "I Heard it Through The Grapevine" and Nouvelle Vague's "Love Will Tear Us Apart". Devo's "I Can't Get No Satisfaction" might slip in there too, towards

X is like Y on Z
Nothing against comparisons as such but the "is like X on (drug)" thing really is lazy and annoying.
Here's a clip showing what's wrong with it - http://www.youtube.com/watc…

Jesus F Christ, what is wrong here? If it's good it's good, if it's not it's not. Who cares about whether Britney was responsible for it in any way? Why does that matter at all?

Whether she has or had any talent is irrelevant. If the music is good then it's good. She has fairly little to do with it. Pop music has always been like this, and good system or bad system, some great music has come through it. Plenty of bad music too, but that's how it goes. James Blunt is a