avclub-7531a93baf5da0105892793cdeaf8cf8--disqus
Gale Boetticher
avclub-7531a93baf5da0105892793cdeaf8cf8--disqus

Well, that was the first point where he actually acknowledged it, so I'm sure there probably weren't any left by then. But I'm just talking generally about how people were still holding out with their "Walt is an awesome badass" long past the point where Gilligan repeatedly hammered it into everyone's head that he

Well, maybe he does all that because….he knows that Chuck has a good reason to be a dick to him.

The thing is, everyone hates him….. but really, all signs point to him being spot on with his judgment of his brother. He just can't believe that Jimmy could change and walk the straight and narrow path…..and he's been right the entire time. James McGill Esq. is not quite as bad as Slippin' Jimmy and not even close

"He helped his brother escape jailtime, once, but he's been hanging that over Jimmy's head for years. Literally, years."

It plants the seed of "reasonable" doubt. The cop with the most access/contact with the evidence not only being a racist, but actually committing perjury on the stand. (He winds up having to take the Fifth when they confront him with evidence and witnesses showing that he repeatedly used the word.)

Any episode that is Koral-heavy automatically drops down to at most a C from me. God damn, it's like he's managed to become an even WORSE actor as the show has gone on.

Well, if I cared at all about the Kardashians and their origin story, then I might have been interested in that. But….nope.

I think he's doing a good job as an actor playing the part of "famous black man charged with double murder." But I still just can't look at him or listen to him speak and think "That's OJ."

One more stupid fucking "wink" to the Kardashians and I'm gonna nope right the fuck out of this show. I guess Ryan Murphy has to find some way to make everything unbearable, no matter what.

Well, she'd probably have 3-4 votes guaranteed, then she could play the underdog card and maybe sneak out the other 2 or 3 she'd need. I think Fish would be the only 100% lock for Jeremy, because of the idol.

Eh, I think Spencer and Tasha could have probably seen that Jeremy would run away with it. If he didn't win immunity there, I think they would have at least seriously thought about making one last "big move" and taking him out.

I think that was more of a "gloating" or "villain taking pleasure in explaining herself" kind of thing. Like Patti trying to make Kevin "understand." The GR want people to "understand" their "truth," and Meg is like Patti taken to the extreme at this point. Just like how she wanted to "get Tommy pregnant," she just

Where was she attempting to "recruit Matt and the camp outsiders?" She was there to scope out the bridge (when she's on the phone, while driving with Tommy, she says she has to check out the bridge.) She wasn't looking like she wanted to talk to anyone, and likely wouldn't if not for Matt being there and recognizing

If I hadn't watched that crap, I'd know just from seeing this review that it must have been a terrible episode. Anything that could get this reviewer to break with his "Every episode gets at least a B, no matter how boring and unoriginal it gets!!" grading scale would have to be especially bad.

Automatic F for the "Nobody's safe…….unless fans like you!" death fakeout we all knew was coming. Even if they eventually wind up killing him like the comics, this was just too much bullshit to stomach.

Seemed to me he was pretty set on going with Laurie's help until Nora called him back. At that point, his desperation to get her back leads to him going for the quick fix, since Nora didn't seem like she'd be up for sticking around for him in an institution.

We have no real clue what exactly Virgil did. But in the first episode we get Michael sneaking out to meet him late at night for a "prayer session." Then we find out that if John knew about this, he'd kill Virgil. And then tonight we have relatively solid proof that Virgil molested John.

Oh, I definitely agree with you that that the idea that Virgil ACTUALLY has been abusing Michael is pretty unlikely. I just agree with ngork that the show has definitely been trying to make us think that's a possibility. Mostly, just backing him up after everybody said he's crazy for seeing that.

You have literally no factual basis for saying that Virgil never saw Michael until recently. All we know about their history is that John tried to kill him at some point before Michael was five years old (I think it was five, in that story Erika told about the flooded bathtub or whatever). That's it. Him being an

Because abused people never return to their abusers….. Errrrr.