Wait, what does Community have to do with HP?

Thor movie? I thought it was the third Loki movie!

Tom Hiddleston and Loki are hardly the alone as enjoyable pop culture phenomena with fan bases that can be excessive — and thin-skinned when called on their excesses (I say this as a big fan of Supernatural). Just do what I do — stay off Tumblr and any commenting system where commenters take an actor's last name as…

To be honest, I thought the Yorkie had been voiced by an old woman. The dog said something about being 14 years old, and I thought it was more sad than anything else, since older pets rarely get adopted.

I have nothing against Neil Gaiman, but I'm willing to reconsider my stance after seeing this.

Unfortunately, that's not what most SPN Tumblrites fixate on, but I'd also follow the crap out of that Tumblr if it existed. Based on a very quick search, there doesn't seem to be one.

My cats only found their way to the sofa after that part was over.

When I saw it in a preview, I thought it was a painfully bad joke and took it as an ill omen for the episode. The explanation for the glasse worked just fine, and steered away from the cheap shots at vegans.

I thought that dog was female, but does it even matter? Dogs love belly rubs. It's nothing sexual. Crazy fangirls like that are the reason why I avoid most online fandoms. Becky Rosen is a downright charitable caricature.

You're not alone. Jared Padalecki has been live tweeting during this season's episodes, and last night he admitted that he didn't much care for the animal voices, either.

Nah, he's not that whimsical or squeamish. Taxidermy is more of a hobby for him. His day job is butcher.

Maybe, but where I live, dog owners can be such utter fucking cretins and shelters are so underfunded that I've known shelter volunteers who opine that many pets are better off as strays.

I have a cousin who is a taxidermist and a huge GoT fan. He occasionally does whimsical taxidermy, so I must now put a bug in his ear about this.

Am I correct in thinking that S.N.A.R.T. is a 30 Rock allusion (sneeze-fart)? Part of me has always thought that Dean Winchester and Liz Lemon would make a cute fictional couple if only because they're both workaholics and gluttons with no real fashion sense.

I was really hoping that Dean would keep the dog and take him back to the bunker, where the Colonel's highly sporadic presence would be referenced in passing just like Garth's and now Kevin's.

I assumed it was a Bonanza reference, but I'm not familiar enough with it to see the dog's reasoning behind the nickname.

The fetching was great because it wasn't obviously dog-like. It could just as easily have been mistake for human OCD behavior.

I came away very happy. I was fully expecting silly MoTW of the week fun, but I was a little worried when the opening was a callback to all of the funniest episodes and seemed a little too much like strenuous insistence that we should like this one just as much. I was even more worried when the writers' credits did…

I loved that bit because I've hated "I Want To Know What Love Is" from the first time I heard it 30 years ago. That dog knows his rawk.

Yeah, it would have been more believable in, say, Oregon, where hippies and loggers do sometimes rub shoulders. (And B.C. looks a lot more like Oregon than Oklahoma.)