I haven't had time to browse the comment section, so I apologize if I'm beating a dead horse.

The case of the week was what we're used to seeing on TV, sure, with a potential trope husband-and-wife whodunit framing the legal investigation. The three question gimmick served to confuse an already serpentine plot. My only question is, though, whether it was legally feasible, whether an inquest works like that,…

David Sims, you are such a fanboy.

Again, I find that the reviews focus on plot almost to exclusivity. Absolutely, the campaign was surprisingly ill-conceived and ran on an empty engine, and yes, it shows in this episode in which the stakes don't match the drama. But the episode brought the characters together with interesting chemistry.

Yes, I'm late. Yes, I'll repeat some of the things already said. And yes, I care about the show, and these reviews.

This was a solid review. It didn't come from the same place I view this show, or David Sims does, I'd say, but it came from a place a lot of people view it from. The relationship drama. The Will and Alicia kiss was a big deal, bookending this review, encapsulating the essence of the show! I still don't get it, really,…

There was nothing minus about this A.

The show is being retooled, henceforth named "How I Lost Your Mother" - find out in ten years!

The show is afraid of time, of telling stories; I've said the same about "Made to Suffer", and it extends naturally into this episode. The infiltration ends the way it started, abruptly and haphazardly. The consistent lack of design to the story's plot and writing always brings it back to choke points such as these,…

This article sounds like a milder version of my opinion of Season Three.

This was excellent. I didn't expect it to be, and it turned out to be the best episode in a while.
The show hardly concealed its twist - as far removed from the law profession as possible, I still frowned at the sudden offer of partnership to a fourth year associate. The questions toppled themselves: As the ones…

I do like aspects of this post (and am not too grouchy to appreciate the positivity), and I know this has nothing to do with Supernatural (which I quit watching when Kripke left), but I just wanted to point out: It's fine that there's a surge of web series with stars attached, diminishing the importance of networks,…

Shame on me, I guess, because this episode had me fooled more than twice.

At this point, I really feel like the reviewer is antagonistic towards the show. This feels like target practice, trying to see how much one can hit with one magazine. Now, objectively, a lot of the targets in this review have merit, but at times, and particularly in such numbers, it feels petty.

I don't know whether I hate the Kalinda and Nick-plot on The Good Wife more for its incongruous awfulness or the incessant critical beating the show as a whole gets for it, particularly here. This article covers the first half of 2012 and complains about storylines in the second half of the year.

I don't know whether I hate the Kalinda and Nick-plot on The Good Wife more for its incongruous awfulness or the incessant critical beating the show as a whole gets for it, particularly here. This article covers the first half of 2012 and complains about storylines in the second half of the year.

Well, all the best to Mr Mazzara. It took incredible humility (for Hollywood types) to retool the show by listening so openly to fan criticism. It's not that I don't have my issues with the series (it's now super afraid of exposition and talking), but I enjoy it immensely.

Well, all the best to Mr Mazzara. It took incredible humility (for Hollywood types) to retool the show by listening so openly to fan criticism. It's not that I don't have my issues with the series (it's now super afraid of exposition and talking), but I enjoy it immensely.

Well,… shit.

Well,… shit.