avclub-6de9626e558a32ecd711aa5c2944c998--disqus
ncc1701
avclub-6de9626e558a32ecd711aa5c2944c998--disqus

@avclub-e57f718840a576abbb40a7d046c4e3b0:disqus Wait a minute.  You won't watch the show because of BRITNEY SPEAR'S feelings on it?

@KyleRyan:disqus  He says "not yet" but I still don't recall a whole lot of raging against the dying of the light.

The events of the 2009 ST supposedly created an alternate timeline that diverges from the TOS one. Of course, the Eugenics Wars and the exile of Khan happened before that, so the transformation of Khan from a buff Indian warlord into Benedict Cumberbatch is…odd.  Of course, it's all okay because they ran through every

He revisits his life with her, but not sure how much bargaining he was doing.  There was the odd moment of hesitation, but he seemed pretty willing to let it all go.  (As long as it goes in a flashy musical number.)

I thought about checking out "Sleepy Hollow" but then Orci had his little fit about people not appreciating his genius nor consuming with un-critical delight the bounty of sophistication and masterful story-telling  that was "ST Into Darkness" and that put me off it.  (I mean, how dare I feel patronized and pandered

SPOILER ALERT!
.
.
.
.
.
His boyhood sled that was actually a ghost THE WHOLE TIME!

And I didn't think you really knew me.

This has applications in the courtroom too.  it's called the "Zimmerman defense."

I don't think that's necessarily true.  he could be getting a producer credit as part of the deal he made for the rights to the book.  I don't if it's true, but it is possible.

@avclub-9079ea527e08a24dfad44e3302d5f091:disqus :  Speaking from personal experience, I can say that I never called out my kin for comparing Bush  to a homicidal dictator.  Because they never did.  They called him a moron.  Clueless.  A puppet of the sort of evil that starts wars and causes untold misery based on

Okay.  You got close.  Quoting a right-wing pundit's unattributed claim to have heard (or once read about somewhere—maybe in a magazine or something) is almost an argument made with actual evidence.

How long would it take you to name one?

This is the only podcast that, about once a year, I re-listen to from the beginning of its run.
Of course, I think of that as my annual trip thorough the porthole of time.

The Patriots are my favored squadron!  Onward, lads!

Despite my diatribe above, I believe we will easily take the AFC East and then will be carried out of the first play-off game on a stretcher.

There are occasionally surges of testosterone around these parts.

I'm with you.  I didn't read any further than the "he'll only discuss it if we call it Flappy" bit because it just made him sound like such a "look at me, the special little artistic snowflake" doofus.

You seem fun.

According to Poe, a dream within a dream is actually the basic nature of human existence.

@avclub-3e9e0f1010418374c3dd9ccf3b0ed27c:disqus You know what else  would be in the "things I didn't see" column? I didn't see a a nut job armed with weapons he obtained legally and legally modified  to be more deadly open fire killing six people and injuring thirteen.  I'm betting you didn't see that either even