Using the Dexter analogy, that would make Jones this season's Dokes. Uh-oh.

Agreed on both counts Rammedfan.

I'm in favor of anything anti-Ford (damn that Henry and his anti-semitic rantings).

Hey Nancy,

Nice of you to say dogpoet. And yeah, in general, we do our best to be fully proofed, and I personally take great pains to make published draft as clean as I can. If I can offer some insight in between the typos, I'm happy :) Oh, and FWIW, if you wanna follow me on Twitter, I'm at https://twitter.com/KennyHe…

Actually, I'm glad you brought that up. I intended to give a shoutout to Dan Shattuck, who did write a great episode.

As always, the ratings are a bit relative with a show that I've reviewed for this many episodes. It was better than last week's, but I don't want to set the bar too high yet….

For whatever it's worth, the irony of the "prevue" thing is it was a typo of "pervue," which is still the misspelling of purview. So much for spell check.

Interesting point.

There's always a couple head-shakers.

Ah, hadn't seen the movie yet so didn't even pick up on it.

I like Siegel. I could stand for him to stick around.

He'd also probably find a way to make knee socks fashionable to work around the anklet.

I think what ultimately separates this show from a more serious drama is that we don't need to second-guess where Neal's loyalties lie. It's just a matter of how many compromising positions he'll put himself and Peter in. Hence, capers!

There's more of us?

This is true.

I have my ways… Stay tuned.

Also, re: the anklet, what happens if Neal ever wants to wear shorts?

That is true, and the jealousy would suit their weird bromance-ness.

I was meaning to look into that. Want me to see if I can get the network to confirm?